Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2017
Cardiac CT assessment of tissue thickness at the ostium of the left atrial appendage predicts acute success of radiofrequency ablation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Whitaker John, Panikker Sandeep, Fastl Thomas, Corrado Cesare, Virmani Renu, Kutys Robert, Lim Eric, O'Neill Mark, Nicol Ed, Niederer Steven, Wong Tom
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Tissue thickness at the site of ablation is a determinant of lesion transmurality. We reported the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, incorporating deliberate left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation and occlusion, and identified systematic differences in ostial LAA tissue thickness in a matched cohort of cadaveric specimens.
METHODS: Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography (CCT) scans were acquired from 22 patients undergoing LAA isolation and subsequent occlusion. Using a novel CCT wall thickness algorithm, LAA ostial wall thickness was assessed in vivo, compared with measurements from the cadaveric specimens, and analyzed for differences between regions that demonstrated acute electrical reconnection and those that did not.
RESULTS: Mean tissue thickness calculated for each LAA ostial quadrant was 2.1 (±0.6) mm (anterior quadrant), 1.9 (±0.4) mm (superior quadrant), 1.5 (±0.4) mm (posterior quadrant), and 1.8 (±0.7) mm (inferior quadrant). Tissue was significantly thicker in the anterior (P = 0.004) and superior quadrants (P = 0.014) than the posterior quadrant. Higher thickness measurements were recorded from quadrants demonstrated to be thicker from histology. Tissue was significantly thicker in regions that demonstrated acute electrical reconnection (1.9 (±0.6) mm) when compared with those that did not (1.6 (±0.5) mm) (P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: CCT imaging may be used to detect differences in wall thickness at different atrial locations and success of LAA ablation may be affected by local tissue thickness. Atrial wall thickness may need to be considered as a metric to guide titration of radiofrequency energy for safe and successful ablation.
METHODS: Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography (CCT) scans were acquired from 22 patients undergoing LAA isolation and subsequent occlusion. Using a novel CCT wall thickness algorithm, LAA ostial wall thickness was assessed in vivo, compared with measurements from the cadaveric specimens, and analyzed for differences between regions that demonstrated acute electrical reconnection and those that did not.
RESULTS: Mean tissue thickness calculated for each LAA ostial quadrant was 2.1 (±0.6) mm (anterior quadrant), 1.9 (±0.4) mm (superior quadrant), 1.5 (±0.4) mm (posterior quadrant), and 1.8 (±0.7) mm (inferior quadrant). Tissue was significantly thicker in the anterior (P = 0.004) and superior quadrants (P = 0.014) than the posterior quadrant. Higher thickness measurements were recorded from quadrants demonstrated to be thicker from histology. Tissue was significantly thicker in regions that demonstrated acute electrical reconnection (1.9 (±0.6) mm) when compared with those that did not (1.6 (±0.5) mm) (P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: CCT imaging may be used to detect differences in wall thickness at different atrial locations and success of LAA ablation may be affected by local tissue thickness. Atrial wall thickness may need to be considered as a metric to guide titration of radiofrequency energy for safe and successful ablation.