Impact of surround flow catheter tip irrigation in contact force ablation on the incidence of asymptomatic oesophageal lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective comparative study.

AIMS: Aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a recently introduced contact force ablation catheter with modified irrigation technology compared with a conventionally irrigated ablation catheter on the incidence of endoscopically detected oesophageal lesions (EDEL).

METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent left atrial radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation were prospectively enrolled. Patients were ablated using a single-tip RF contact force ablation catheter with conventional irrigation (Group 1; n = 50) or with a recently introduced intensified 'surround flow' irrigation technology (Group 2; n = 50). Assessment of EDEL was performed by oesophagogastroduodenoscopy in all patients after ablation. A total of 100 patients (mean age 63.6 ± 12.1 years; men 58%) with paroxysmal (n = 41; 41%) or persistent AF were included. Groups 1 and 2 patients were comparable in regard to baseline characteristics and procedural parameters, especially ablation time at posterior left atrial wall. Overall, 13 patients (13%) developed EDEL after AF ablation (8 oesophageal ulcerations, 5 erythema). The incidence of EDEL including oesophageal ulcerations was higher in Group 2 compared with Group 1 patients without statistical significance (18 vs. 8%, P = 0.23). One pericardial tamponade and one access site bleeding occurred in Group 2. No further adverse events were reported in both groups.

CONCLUSION: According to these preliminary results, the use of an improved ablation catheter irrigation technology (surround flow) in conjunction with contact force measurement was associated with a higher but not statistically significant probability of oesophageal thermal lesions. Further studies including larger patient cohorts are needed.