Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2016
Staged versus Simultaneous Thoracoscopic Hybrid Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Does Not Affect Time to Recurrence of Atrial Arrhythmia.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Richardson Travis D, Shoemaker M Benjamin, Whalen S Patrick, Hoff Steven J, Ellis Christopher R
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Totally thoracoscopic (TT) epicardial ablation combined with endocardial catheter ablation is an emerging treatment for persistent AF. The effects of timing of the TT and endocardial portion on AT/AF recurrence are not known.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing TT staged versus simultaneous hybrid AF ablation at our institution. Arrhythmia-free outcome was compared using time to recurrence (AF or AT greater than 30 seconds after a 3-month blanking period from endocardial ablation) at 12 months. All subjects had continuous ILR or PM monitoring.
RESULTS: Eighty-three patients (52 same-day, 31 staged) underwent TT hybrid AF ablation. Recurrence was observed in 23 (29%) patients at a median time of 147 days (IQR 91,238). In univariate analysis, a staged approach significantly increased the likelihood of detecting incomplete PVI (OR 6 [95% CI 2-17] P = 0.001). However, only longstanding persistent AF (LSP-AF) status predicted recurrence (HR 4 [95% CI 1.4-12] P = 0.01). Neither a staged approach (HR 1.0 [95% CI 0.4-2.4] P = 0.9), nor detection of incomplete PVI (HR 0.9 [95% CI 0.4-2.3] P = 0.8) predicted time to first AF/AT recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Staged hybrid ablation of AF significantly increases the likelihood of discovering incomplete PVI at the time of endocardial mapping versus a same-day procedure. However, the staged approach did not improve time to first AT/AF recurrence.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing TT staged versus simultaneous hybrid AF ablation at our institution. Arrhythmia-free outcome was compared using time to recurrence (AF or AT greater than 30 seconds after a 3-month blanking period from endocardial ablation) at 12 months. All subjects had continuous ILR or PM monitoring.
RESULTS: Eighty-three patients (52 same-day, 31 staged) underwent TT hybrid AF ablation. Recurrence was observed in 23 (29%) patients at a median time of 147 days (IQR 91,238). In univariate analysis, a staged approach significantly increased the likelihood of detecting incomplete PVI (OR 6 [95% CI 2-17] P = 0.001). However, only longstanding persistent AF (LSP-AF) status predicted recurrence (HR 4 [95% CI 1.4-12] P = 0.01). Neither a staged approach (HR 1.0 [95% CI 0.4-2.4] P = 0.9), nor detection of incomplete PVI (HR 0.9 [95% CI 0.4-2.3] P = 0.8) predicted time to first AF/AT recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Staged hybrid ablation of AF significantly increases the likelihood of discovering incomplete PVI at the time of endocardial mapping versus a same-day procedure. However, the staged approach did not improve time to first AT/AF recurrence.