MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/cogs.13007

Медицинская библиотека · Cognitive science · 2021

Memory and Counterfactual Simulations for Past Wrongdoings Foster Moral Learning and Improvement.

Stanley Matthew L, Cabeza Roberto, Smallman Rachel, De Brigard Felipe

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In four studies, we investigated the role of remembering, reflecting on, and mutating personal past moral transgressions to learn from those moral mistakes and to form intentions for moral improvement. Participants reported having ruminated on their past wrongdoings, particularly their more severe transgressions, and they reported having frequently thought about morally better ways in which they could have acted instead (i.e., morally upward counterfactuals; Studies 1-3). The more that participants reported having mentally simulated morally better ways in which they could have acted, the stronger their intentions were to improve in the future (Studies 2 and 3). Implementing an experimental manipulation, we then found that making accessible a morally upward counterfactual after committing a moral transgression strengthened reported intentions for moral improvement-relative to resimulating the remembered event and considering morally worse ways in which they could have acted instead (Study 4). We discuss the implications of these results for competing theoretical views on the relationship between memory and morality and for functional theories of counterfactual thinking.

Для цитирования: Stanley Matthew L, Cabeza Roberto, Smallman Rachel, De Brigard Felipe. Memory and Counterfactual Simulations for Past Wrongdoings Foster Moral Learning and Improvement.. Cognitive science. 2021. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.