MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102050

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical psychology review · 2021

The relationship between executive functioning and repetitive negative thinking in youth: A systematic review of the literature.

Mennies Rebekah J, Stewart Lindsey C, Olino Thomas M

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) and executive functioning (EF) deficits are each characteristic of many forms of youth psychopathology. Extensive work has examined the relationship between rumination, a form of RNT, and EF in adults. However, less is known about the relationship between RNT more broadly and EF in youth, for whom these constructs are developing and emerging. Here, we systematically and qualitatively reviewed 27 studies on the associations between EF (e.g., shifting, inhibition, working memory) and RNT (e.g., rumination, worry, obsessions) in youth. All forms of RNT were more commonly positively associated with questionnaire-reported EF problems in daily life, most frequently in the domain of shifting. Task-based assessments of EF were less consistently associated with RNT in youth, with no strong pattern of presence vs. absence of associations. Further, limited longitudinal work has been conducted on this topic to date. This review integrates initial work with regard to RNT and EF deficits in a still-developing population, and discusses clear future need for longitudinal, multi-method assessments of the relationship between RNT and EF subtypes in youth.

Для цитирования: Mennies Rebekah J, Stewart Lindsey C, Olino Thomas M. The relationship between executive functioning and repetitive negative thinking in youth: A systematic review of the literature.. Clinical psychology review. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102050.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.