MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jclp.23158

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical psychology · 2021

Examining rumination, devaluation of positivity, and depressive symptoms via community-based network analysis.

Collins Amanda C, Lass Alisson N S, Jordan D Gage, Winer E Samuel

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Components of rumination, including brooding and reflection, as well as devaluating prospective positivity, may help maintain depressive symptoms. We examined these components together for the first time using network analysis.

METHODS

We examined the robustness of rumination communities of closely related items in one network and then examined the interrelationships between rumination communities, devaluation of positivity, and depression, in a second network.

RESULTS

Three rumination communities emerged, replicating findings of Bernstein et al. (2019). Within a dense network, nodes representing brooding, reflective pondering, and difficulty trusting positive feelings were most influential. In addition, the node representing the depressive symptom negative self-views shared strong edges with nodes representing devaluation of positivity and brooding.

CONCLUSION

Brooding, reflective pondering, and elements of devaluing positivity are influential to depressive symptoms and may be important future experimental and therapeutic targets. Depressed individuals with negative self-views may engage in brooding and devalue their experience of positivity.

Для цитирования: Collins Amanda C, Lass Alisson N S, Jordan D Gage, Winer E Samuel. Examining rumination, devaluation of positivity, and depressive symptoms via community-based network analysis.. Journal of clinical psychology. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23158.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.