Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2011
Extraparenchymal neurocysticercosis in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Figueroa Juan J, Davis Larry E, Magalhaes Alvaro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: neurocysticercosis (NCC) prevalence is increasing throughout the United States mainly because of immigration from Latin America. Clinicians may fail to recognize the extraparenchymal disease because they do not consider the diagnosis.
METHODS: to analyze neuroimaging and clinical characteristics of extraparenchymal NCC, we retrospectively reviewed all such cases presenting to a major general medical school hospital in the State of New Mexico.
RESULTS: eleven (30%) of our 37 cases of NCC diagnosed using standard criteria from 1998 through 2004 had extraparenchymal disease. On neuroimaging, 36% of the patients lacked parenchymal cysts, 64% had intraventricular cysticerci, 64% had subarachnoid cysticerci, and 64% had hydrocephalus due to either basal arachnoiditis or direct obstruction of intraventricular pathways. Lumbar puncture was performed in 6 patients. All had a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis, none had CSF or blood eosinophilia, and CSF antibody to NCC could be absent while present in serum. Response to treatment was frequently suboptimal.
CONCLUSIONS: extraparenchymal NCC is more frequent than previously thought. Because clinicians outside the Southwest United States are often unfamiliar with NCC as a cause of chronic meningitis, chronic ventriculitis, or hydrocephalus without obvious cysts, the diagnosis of extraparenchymal NCC often depends on the correct interpretation of neuroimaging.
METHODS: to analyze neuroimaging and clinical characteristics of extraparenchymal NCC, we retrospectively reviewed all such cases presenting to a major general medical school hospital in the State of New Mexico.
RESULTS: eleven (30%) of our 37 cases of NCC diagnosed using standard criteria from 1998 through 2004 had extraparenchymal disease. On neuroimaging, 36% of the patients lacked parenchymal cysts, 64% had intraventricular cysticerci, 64% had subarachnoid cysticerci, and 64% had hydrocephalus due to either basal arachnoiditis or direct obstruction of intraventricular pathways. Lumbar puncture was performed in 6 patients. All had a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis, none had CSF or blood eosinophilia, and CSF antibody to NCC could be absent while present in serum. Response to treatment was frequently suboptimal.
CONCLUSIONS: extraparenchymal NCC is more frequent than previously thought. Because clinicians outside the Southwest United States are often unfamiliar with NCC as a cause of chronic meningitis, chronic ventriculitis, or hydrocephalus without obvious cysts, the diagnosis of extraparenchymal NCC often depends on the correct interpretation of neuroimaging.