Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2026
Patient-reported and physiologic markers of pain and anxiety during high-resolution manometry: An Exploratory Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stewart Sarah, Curtis James A, Mocchetti Valentina, Palte Ilan, Schnoll-Sussman Felice, Soumekh Amir, Zarnegar Rasa, Katz Philip O, Rameau Anaïs
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate how patient-reported and physiologic measures of pain and anxiety are associated with high-resolution manometry (HRM) findings at rest and during swallowing.
METHODS: HRM data and patient-reported and physiologic measures of pain and anxiety were collected from 36 outpatient adults. Multivariable linear regression models were used to assess the associations between pain/anxiety and upper esophageal sphincter (UES)/lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures and esophageal motility outcomes. Predictor variables included: (1) a validated visual analogue scale (VAS) of self-reported pain; (2) the State Trait Anxiety Inventory sum score (STAI); (3) the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ); (4) heart rate before the procedure (HR); and (5) average slope of Galvanic Skin Response (GSRslope). Relationships were assessed both at rest for basal measures and during swallowing for peristaltic measures.
RESULTS: Few statistically significant relationships were observed between patient-reported or physiologic measures of anxiety/pain with esophageal or sphincter measures. However, UES mean residual pressure during swallowing was negatively associated with VAS pain ratings (p = 0.04) and the GSRslope (p = 0.01). Additionally, as SF-MPQ increased, the percentage of intact swallows decreased (adjusted R2 = 0.146; p=0.012).
CONCLUSION: UES resting pressure during HRM procedures was not significantly associated with patient-reported anxiety or pain. However, we saw a small statistically significant inverse association between UES mean residual pressure and patient-reported pain and physiologic arousal (GSRslope). Future research may benefit from continuous physiologic monitoring throughout HRM procedures and from inclusion of a larger sample with more diverse pathology.
METHODS: HRM data and patient-reported and physiologic measures of pain and anxiety were collected from 36 outpatient adults. Multivariable linear regression models were used to assess the associations between pain/anxiety and upper esophageal sphincter (UES)/lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures and esophageal motility outcomes. Predictor variables included: (1) a validated visual analogue scale (VAS) of self-reported pain; (2) the State Trait Anxiety Inventory sum score (STAI); (3) the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ); (4) heart rate before the procedure (HR); and (5) average slope of Galvanic Skin Response (GSRslope). Relationships were assessed both at rest for basal measures and during swallowing for peristaltic measures.
RESULTS: Few statistically significant relationships were observed between patient-reported or physiologic measures of anxiety/pain with esophageal or sphincter measures. However, UES mean residual pressure during swallowing was negatively associated with VAS pain ratings (p = 0.04) and the GSRslope (p = 0.01). Additionally, as SF-MPQ increased, the percentage of intact swallows decreased (adjusted R2 = 0.146; p=0.012).
CONCLUSION: UES resting pressure during HRM procedures was not significantly associated with patient-reported anxiety or pain. However, we saw a small statistically significant inverse association between UES mean residual pressure and patient-reported pain and physiologic arousal (GSRslope). Future research may benefit from continuous physiologic monitoring throughout HRM procedures and from inclusion of a larger sample with more diverse pathology.