Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2023
Effective Optical Zone and Centration Following SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Calculated With a Novel Method.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Shengtao, Liu Jingying, Cheng Chiwen, Cai Yu, Huang Yangyi, Han Tian, Xiao Yichen, Zhou Xingtao
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the effective optical zone (EOZ) and centration in eyes with high myopia after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) using a novel method.
METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 consecutive patients with high myopia scheduled for SMILE or FS-LASIK were enrolled in the study. The EOZ, optical zone decentration, and corneal aberrations were analyzed using Scheimpflug imaging. These values were then analyzed and compared between the two procedures 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean EOZ diameter for SMILE (4.41 ± 0.14 mm) was larger than that for FS-LASIK (4.24 ± 0.28 mm; P = .002), corresponding to reductions of 1.60 ± 0.11 and 1.71 ± 0.21 mm, respectively, compared with the programmed optical zone (POZ) (P = .007). Moreover, the total decentration for SMILE (0.33 ± 0.12 mm) was greater than that for FS-LASIK (0.27 ± 0.15 mm; P = .020). The induction of spherical aberration (SA) was lower with SMILE than with FS-LASIK (P = .007).
CONCLUSIONS: A larger EOZ and less SA were observed after SMILE than after FS-LASIK in eyes with high myopia. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):736-740.].
METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 consecutive patients with high myopia scheduled for SMILE or FS-LASIK were enrolled in the study. The EOZ, optical zone decentration, and corneal aberrations were analyzed using Scheimpflug imaging. These values were then analyzed and compared between the two procedures 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean EOZ diameter for SMILE (4.41 ± 0.14 mm) was larger than that for FS-LASIK (4.24 ± 0.28 mm; P = .002), corresponding to reductions of 1.60 ± 0.11 and 1.71 ± 0.21 mm, respectively, compared with the programmed optical zone (POZ) (P = .007). Moreover, the total decentration for SMILE (0.33 ± 0.12 mm) was greater than that for FS-LASIK (0.27 ± 0.15 mm; P = .020). The induction of spherical aberration (SA) was lower with SMILE than with FS-LASIK (P = .007).
CONCLUSIONS: A larger EOZ and less SA were observed after SMILE than after FS-LASIK in eyes with high myopia. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):736-740.].