Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2020
How to avoid iatrogenic lingual nerve injury in the retromolar area: an anatomical study of retromolar pad and lingual nerve.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Iwanaga Joe, Cleveland Mary Katherine, Wada Junichiro, Tubbs R Shane
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the retromolar gland and pad, and the relationship between the LN and retromolar gland/pad to establish a new landmark for avoiding LN injury.
METHODS: Sixty-two lingual nerves from fresh-frozen cadavers were used for this study. The age of the specimens at the time of death ranged from 57 to 98 with a mean of 76.5 years. The mucous incision was made into the medial border of the retromolar pad and the submucosal tissue depth of the initial incision was bluntly dissected to expose the lingual nerve. When the LN was identified, the mucosa overlying the retromolar pad was removed to expose the retromolar gland to confirm if the retromolar pad corresponds to the retromolar gland.
RESULTS: On all sides, the lingual nerve was found to course medial to the retromolar pad and inferior to the inferior border of the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle to enter the sublingual space via the pterygomandibular space. The retromolar pad corresponded to the retromolar gland on all sides. This demonstrated that the retromolar pad is an overlying mucosa of the retromolar gland. No LN was found to travel through the retromolar gland.
CONCLUSION: We suggest that the retromolar pad can be used as a new landmark for avoiding iatrogenic LN injury.
METHODS: Sixty-two lingual nerves from fresh-frozen cadavers were used for this study. The age of the specimens at the time of death ranged from 57 to 98 with a mean of 76.5 years. The mucous incision was made into the medial border of the retromolar pad and the submucosal tissue depth of the initial incision was bluntly dissected to expose the lingual nerve. When the LN was identified, the mucosa overlying the retromolar pad was removed to expose the retromolar gland to confirm if the retromolar pad corresponds to the retromolar gland.
RESULTS: On all sides, the lingual nerve was found to course medial to the retromolar pad and inferior to the inferior border of the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle to enter the sublingual space via the pterygomandibular space. The retromolar pad corresponded to the retromolar gland on all sides. This demonstrated that the retromolar pad is an overlying mucosa of the retromolar gland. No LN was found to travel through the retromolar gland.
CONCLUSION: We suggest that the retromolar pad can be used as a new landmark for avoiding iatrogenic LN injury.