MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/000841740507200302

Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2005

Perceptions of power mobility use and safety within residential facilities.

Mortenson William B, Miller William C, Boily Jeanette, Steele Barbara, Odell Leslie, Crawford Erin M, Desharnais Guylaine

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Power wheelchairs enhance quality of life by enabling occupation, improving self-esteem and facilitating social interaction. Despite these benefits, the risks associated with power mobility use raise serious concerns in residential facilities.

PURPOSE: As there is no gold standard to assess when a client is unsafe, a two-phase study was conducted to develop client-centred guidelines for power mobility use.

METHOD: In the first phase of the study, presented here, 18 in-depth, qualitative interviews were conducted with a variety of stakeholders, including power mobility users, other residents, staff and family members.

RESULTS

A thematic analysis of the interviews revealed four main themes: 1) the meaning of power mobility, 2) learning the rules of the road, 3) red flags: concerns about safety, and 4) solutions.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Given the importance of power mobility, safety measures need to address issues of mobility and safety for power mobility drivers and those around them.

Для цитирования: Mortenson William B, Miller William C, Boily Jeanette, Steele Barbara, Odell Leslie, Crawford Erin M, Desharnais Guylaine. Perceptions of power mobility use and safety within residential facilities.. Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie. 2005. DOI: 10.1177/000841740507200302.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.