MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12886-016-0321-2

Медицинская библиотека · BMC ophthalmology · 2016

Chung's swing technique: a new technique for small-incision lenticule extraction.

Kim Bu Ki, Mun Su Joung, Lee Dae Gyu, Choi Hyun Tae, Chung Young Taek

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To introduce the Chung's swing technique for small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

A total of 112 eyes of 56 patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: 52 eyes of 26 patients were treated with SMILE using a traditional method (traditional group) and 60 eyes of 30 patients were treated with SMILE using the Chung's swing technique (swing group).

RESULTS

At 1 month postoperatively, all eyes in both groups had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. The efficacy indices were 1.09 ± 0.17 and 1.02 ± 0.11 (p = 0.492), and the safety indices were 1.12 ± 0.14 and 1.09 ± 0.15 (p = 0.537), for the traditional and swing group, respectively. All eyes in both groups underwent successful lenticule extraction; all lenticules were intact and complete. The mean lenticule extraction times were 48.67 ± 4.9 and 39.8 ± 5.53 s, for the traditional and swing group, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Chung's swing technique is efficient for lenticule separation and extraction. Our study results showed good clinical outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0001978 . Registered 22 July 2016. Retrospectively registered.

Для цитирования: Kim Bu Ki, Mun Su Joung, Lee Dae Gyu, Choi Hyun Tae, Chung Young Taek. Chung's swing technique: a new technique for small-incision lenticule extraction.. BMC ophthalmology. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0321-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.