Cornea · 2016
Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Femtosecond LASIK, Wave Front-Guided Femtosecond LASIK, and Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zheng Yan, Zhou Yue-Hua, Zhang Jing, Liu Qian, Zhang Li, Deng Zheng-Zheng, Li Shi-Ming
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) and higher order aberrations (HOAs) at 3 months after femtosecond-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (FS-LASIK), wave front-guided femtosecond LASIK (WF-LASIK), and femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.
METHODS: In this prospective nonrandomized study, 332 right eyes of 332 patients were treated with FS-LASIK, WF-LASIK, or FLEx. The HOAs and mesopic CS were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: At 3 months of follow-up, 98 eyes (96.1%) of the FS-LASIK group, 92 eyes (98.9%) of the WF-LASIK group, and 133 eyes (96.4%) of the FLEx group had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. The HOAs improved from 0.34 μm during preoperative examination to 0.56 μm of the end of the follow-up in the FS-LASIK group, from 0.31 to 0.41 μm in the WF-LASIK group, and from 0.32 to 0.54 μm in the FLEx group (all P < 0.01). At a spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree, a better mesopic CS was observed in the WF-LASIK group (1.47) than in the FS-LASIK (1.36) and FLEx (1.33) groups (P < 0.01); a better mesopic CS with glare was also noted in the WF-LASIK group (1.37) than in the FS-LASIK (1.25) and FLEx (1.29) groups (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The FS-LASIK, WF-LASIK, and FLEx procedures result in comparable refractive results at 3 months postoperatively. However, there is improvement in the mesopic CS and HOAs after WF-LASIK.
METHODS: In this prospective nonrandomized study, 332 right eyes of 332 patients were treated with FS-LASIK, WF-LASIK, or FLEx. The HOAs and mesopic CS were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: At 3 months of follow-up, 98 eyes (96.1%) of the FS-LASIK group, 92 eyes (98.9%) of the WF-LASIK group, and 133 eyes (96.4%) of the FLEx group had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. The HOAs improved from 0.34 μm during preoperative examination to 0.56 μm of the end of the follow-up in the FS-LASIK group, from 0.31 to 0.41 μm in the WF-LASIK group, and from 0.32 to 0.54 μm in the FLEx group (all P < 0.01). At a spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree, a better mesopic CS was observed in the WF-LASIK group (1.47) than in the FS-LASIK (1.36) and FLEx (1.33) groups (P < 0.01); a better mesopic CS with glare was also noted in the WF-LASIK group (1.37) than in the FS-LASIK (1.25) and FLEx (1.29) groups (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The FS-LASIK, WF-LASIK, and FLEx procedures result in comparable refractive results at 3 months postoperatively. However, there is improvement in the mesopic CS and HOAs after WF-LASIK.