Journal of clinical microbiology · 1988
Evaluation of the Mini-ID Enterobacteriaceae screen system.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
O'Hara C M, Smith P B, Schable B A
Аннотация
A total of 932 typical and atypical enteric fermenters were used to evaluate the Mini-ID Enterobacteriaceae Screen/Identification System. At 4 h, final identifications were available for only 13.3%, but an additional 71% were screened into the correct group, according to the product's database. At 24 h, 58.8% were correctly identified to the species level, often with the use of an additional tube. When 118 of the cultures were arranged into a weighted assortment, as might be found in a clinical laboratory, 35 were definitively identified at 4 h, and another 72 were screened into the correct group. Of these 72, 31 were correctly identified to the species level at 24 h, for a total of 56.0%. False-negative ornithine and incorrect L-pyrrolidonyl-beta-naphthylamide and glucuronide xylopyranoside reactions accounted for 54% of the identification errors, while database problems accounted for 10.2% of the errors. Of the eight Salmonella paratyphi A cultures, seven were missed because of a false-positive lysine reaction. At best, the system serves only as a rough screen.