MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0886260504266884

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of interpersonal violence · 2004

Sexual and nonsexual offenders with intellectual and learning disabilities: a comparison of characteristics, referral patterns, and outcome.

Lindsay William R, Smith Anne H W, Law Jacqueline, Quinn Kathleen, Anderson Andrew, Smith Astrid, Allan Ronald

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This article reports an evaluation of a community intellectual disability offender service over the period from 1990 to 2001. Men who committed sex offenses or sexually abusive incidents (n = 106) and men who committed other types of offenses and serious incidents (n = 78) are compared on personal characteristics, referral sources, forensic details, and outcome up to 7 years after referral. The cohorts are older than one would expect from the criminology literature, and, at about 33%, the incidence of mental illness is consistent with some previous studies. A greater proportion of sex offenders had criminal justice involvement and a formal disposal from court. Fire raising was not overly represented as an offense. There was a higher rate of reoffending in the nonsexual cohort, which persisted up to 7 years. Investigating only reoffenders, there was a considerable amount of harm reduction recorded up to 7 years, statistically significant up to 5 years following initial referral.

Для цитирования: Lindsay William R, Smith Anne H W, Law Jacqueline, Quinn Kathleen, Anderson Andrew, Smith Astrid, Allan Ronald. Sexual and nonsexual offenders with intellectual and learning disabilities: a comparison of characteristics, referral patterns, and outcome.. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2004. DOI: 10.1177/0886260504266884.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.