MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12669/pjms.321.8576

Медицинская библиотека · Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2016

The results of photorefractive keratectomy with Mitomycin-C in myopia correction after 5 years.

Hashemi Masih, Amiri Mohammad Aghazadeh, Tabatabaee Mehdi, Ayatollahi Ali

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with mitomycin C in myopia correction after five years.

METHODS

This is a cross sectional study which included 145 eyes of 74 patients in 18 to 51 years age group that were undergoing Photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C using Allegretto Wave Eye-Q 400-Hz excimer laser platform in Markazi Eye Center, Tehran, Iran. All the surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon. After five years follow-up evaluation including BCVA, UCVA, Refractive error measurement and external eye examination was performed.

RESULTS

The mean diopter of spherical equivalent before surgery was -3.40±1.73. The following findings were obtained after 5 years follow up visit: The mean spherical equivalent value: -0.08±0.40, the mean: Log MARUCVA: 0.02±0.07, the mean Log MAR BCVA: 0.00±0.04.

CONCLUSION

PRK is an effective, safe and predictable method used to correct myopia. The wave front-optimized algorithm of the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q 400-Hz excimer laser platform demonstrated good refractive and visual results. Presence of variables such as gender, age and astigmatism before operation have no significant impact on the result of this operation.

Для цитирования: Hashemi Masih, Amiri Mohammad Aghazadeh, Tabatabaee Mehdi, Ayatollahi Ali. The results of photorefractive keratectomy with Mitomycin-C in myopia correction after 5 years.. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2016. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.321.8576.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.