MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5664/jcsm.11712

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025

Comparison of side effects of different mandibular advancement devices for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang Xi, Chen Hui, Ge Shaohua, Orhan Kaan, van der Stelt Paul, Shi Xie-Qi

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are widely used as noncontinuous positive airway pressure treatment options for obstructive sleep apnea, but they are associated with some side effects. To figure out the side effects related to MAD design and aid clinical decision-making, this systematic review compares the types and severity of side effects caused by both the adjustable and the nonadjustable MADs.

METHODS

Three databases were searched until May 2024 and 26 relevant studies were eligible for inclusion. The side effects examined include dentoskeletal changes and issues related to the temporomandibular joint, masticatory muscles, or periodontium.

RESULTS

Compared with adjustable MADs (overjet: mean difference [MD]: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.66-1.30; overbite: MD: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.67-1.30), nonadjustable MADs show less change in overjet (MD: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.49-1.28) and overbite (MD: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.32-1.26). Adjustable MADs have less impact on temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles than nonadjustable MADs. However, there were no significant differences in sella-nasion-A point (MD: 0.10, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.56), sella-nasion-B point (MD: 0.19, 95% CI: -0.28 to 0.67), or A-nasion-B point (MD: -0.14, 95% CI: -0.42 to 0.15) after treatment of either type of MAD. There were no signs of periodontitis or bone resorption observed after treatment with adjustable MAD.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide valuable information for clinicians in selecting an appropriate MAD. However, given the limitations of the current evidence, there is no single superior custom MAD design in terms of side effects at present.

CITATION: Wang X, Chen H, Ge S, Orhan K, van der Stelt P, Shi X-Q. Comparison of side effects of different mandibular advancement devices for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(8):1477-1486.

Для цитирования: Wang Xi, Chen Hui, Ge Shaohua, Orhan Kaan, van der Stelt Paul, Shi Xie-Qi. Comparison of side effects of different mandibular advancement devices for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.11712.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.