Journal of interventional cardiology · 2011
Emergency transthoracic transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Garsse Leen A F M, Gelsomino Sandro, van Ommen Vincent, Lucà Fabiana, Maessen Jos
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The valve-in-valve (VIV) technique is an emerging therapeutic option for patients with failure of previously implanted xenografts. We describe a balloon-expandable transthoracic transapical mitral VIV implantation in an emergency setting in a 69-year-old woman with dysfunction of the mitral bioprosthesis.
METHODS: Left ventricular apical access was applied. After balloon valvuloplasty, a 26-mm Edwards-Sapien transcatheter valve (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA) was deployed within the mitral xenograft, using rapid ventricular pacing.
RESULTS: The transcatheter valve functioned properly postoperatively and three-dimensional echocardiography carried out 1 month later showed a well-functioning VIV prosthesis and no mitral stenosis (mitral valve area 3 cm(2) , mean gradient 3 mmHg).
CONCLUSIONS: In this patient, VIV implantation was found to be a safe alternative to an emergent valve replacement. It might represent a suitable option to conventional procedures even among lower risk patients.
METHODS: Left ventricular apical access was applied. After balloon valvuloplasty, a 26-mm Edwards-Sapien transcatheter valve (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA) was deployed within the mitral xenograft, using rapid ventricular pacing.
RESULTS: The transcatheter valve functioned properly postoperatively and three-dimensional echocardiography carried out 1 month later showed a well-functioning VIV prosthesis and no mitral stenosis (mitral valve area 3 cm(2) , mean gradient 3 mmHg).
CONCLUSIONS: In this patient, VIV implantation was found to be a safe alternative to an emergent valve replacement. It might represent a suitable option to conventional procedures even among lower risk patients.