Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions · 2023
Peri-Coronary Adipose Tissue Is a Predictor of Stent Failure in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nogic Jason, Kim Jiwon, Layland Jamie, Cheng Kevin, Dey Damini, Wong Dennis T, Cameron James D, Brown Adam J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Coronary inflammation is postulated as a driver of atherosclerosis and dysfunctional arterial healing which may trigger stent failure. Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation, detected on computer tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), is an emerging non-invasive marker of coronary inflammation. This propensity matched study assessed the utility of both lesion specific (PCATLesion) and standardized PCAT attenuation as assessed in the proximal RCA (PCATRCA) as a predictor of stent failure in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. This is the first study to our knowledge that assesses the association of PCAT with stent failure.
METHODS: Patients undergoing CTCA assessment for coronary artery disease with subsequent stent insertion within 60 days and repeat coronary angiography for any clinical reason within 5 years were included in the study. Stent failure was defined as binary restenosis of >50 % on quantitative coronary angiography analysis or stent thrombosis. Both PCATLesion and PCATRCA was assessed utilizing semi-automated proprietary software on baseline CTCA. Patients with stent failure were propensity matched utilizing age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors and procedural characteristics.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 26 (17.2 %) had study-defined failure. A significant difference in PCATLesion attenuation between patients with and without failure was observed (-79.0 ± 12.6 vs. -85.9 ± 10.3HU, p = 0.035). There was no significant difference in PCATRCA attenuation between the two groups (-79.5 ± 10.1 vs -81.0 ± 12.3HU, p = 0.50). Univariate regression analysis showed PCATLesion attenuation was independently associated with stent failure (OR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.01-1.12, P = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stent failure exhibit significantly increased PCATLesion attenuation at baseline. These data suggest that baseline plaque inflammation may be an important driver for coronary stent failure.
METHODS: Patients undergoing CTCA assessment for coronary artery disease with subsequent stent insertion within 60 days and repeat coronary angiography for any clinical reason within 5 years were included in the study. Stent failure was defined as binary restenosis of >50 % on quantitative coronary angiography analysis or stent thrombosis. Both PCATLesion and PCATRCA was assessed utilizing semi-automated proprietary software on baseline CTCA. Patients with stent failure were propensity matched utilizing age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors and procedural characteristics.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 26 (17.2 %) had study-defined failure. A significant difference in PCATLesion attenuation between patients with and without failure was observed (-79.0 ± 12.6 vs. -85.9 ± 10.3HU, p = 0.035). There was no significant difference in PCATRCA attenuation between the two groups (-79.5 ± 10.1 vs -81.0 ± 12.3HU, p = 0.50). Univariate regression analysis showed PCATLesion attenuation was independently associated with stent failure (OR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.01-1.12, P = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stent failure exhibit significantly increased PCATLesion attenuation at baseline. These data suggest that baseline plaque inflammation may be an important driver for coronary stent failure.