International ophthalmology · 2024
Proportion and risk factors of epiretinal membrane in residents of Brussels with versus without diabetes mellitus.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Panagiotou Dimitrios Ζ, Van Den Eeckhaute Laura, Laouani Achraf, Coquelet Pascale, Papadaki Maria, Frère Ariane, Baali Walid, Tsaousis Konstantinos T, Postelmans Laurence Dominique
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the proportion of epiretinal membrane (ERM) between individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) and without DM, who live in Brussels, to investigate possible risk factors for ERM formation and to compare the results with the ones of large population studies.
METHODS: Participants were divided into two groups; 99 patients with DM (group A) and 103 individuals without DM (group B). All participants underwent an undilated 7-field color fundus photography and a spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Age, gender, race, type of diabetes, duration of medical treatment of diabetes, HbA1C rate, smoking, previous cataract surgery and educational level were investigated as possible risk factors.
RESULTS: Epiretinal membrane was detected in 17.2% of group A and in 11.7% of group B participants. The difference is not statistically significant (χ2 (1) = 1.252, p = 0.263). The proportion of ERM was significantly associated with age in both groups (p = .009 and p < .001 respectively), as well as with smoking (p = .023) and previous cataract surgery (p = .028) in patients with DM.
CONCLUSION: There is no statistically significant difference of ERM proportion between the two groups of the study. Age was recognized as a risk factor for both groups, while smoking and previous cataract surgery were identified as predictors only for diabetics.
METHODS: Participants were divided into two groups; 99 patients with DM (group A) and 103 individuals without DM (group B). All participants underwent an undilated 7-field color fundus photography and a spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Age, gender, race, type of diabetes, duration of medical treatment of diabetes, HbA1C rate, smoking, previous cataract surgery and educational level were investigated as possible risk factors.
RESULTS: Epiretinal membrane was detected in 17.2% of group A and in 11.7% of group B participants. The difference is not statistically significant (χ2 (1) = 1.252, p = 0.263). The proportion of ERM was significantly associated with age in both groups (p = .009 and p < .001 respectively), as well as with smoking (p = .023) and previous cataract surgery (p = .028) in patients with DM.
CONCLUSION: There is no statistically significant difference of ERM proportion between the two groups of the study. Age was recognized as a risk factor for both groups, while smoking and previous cataract surgery were identified as predictors only for diabetics.