Heliyon · 2023
A diabetic foot wound healing assessment tool: A scoping review.
СтатьяScoping ReviewНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jais Suriadi, Pratama Kharisma
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Indonesia faces a challenge in controlling the burden of diabetic foot ulcers, which necessitates a nursing care management approach to optimize the healing of complications by accurately monitoring wound healing progress using wound assessment tools.
METHODS: This literature review, which is part of a scoping study framework, searched electronic databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar to find papers relevant to the Indonesian context. Five papers were chosen from a total of 463 papers discovered.
RESULTS: The diabetic foot ulcer wound assessment tools DFUAS (diabetic foot ulcer assessment scale), DMIST (deep, maceration, infection, size, and tunneling), and MUNGS (maceration, undermining, necrotic, granulation, and symptoms/signs) were identified in the literature review. For leg ulcers, LUMT (leg ulcer measurement tool) and RESVECH 2.0 (Results Expected from Chronic Wound Healing Assessment) were used. DMIST, DFUAS, and MUNGS are used to predict healed and non-healing wounds. LUMT determines the evaluation and documentation of leg ulcers, and RESVECH 2.0 is designed to shorten the duration of chronic wound occurrence. The psychometric properties of the DMIST scale were identified, including reliability, validity, and responsiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: Five tools for assessing chronic wounds were identified. The predictive validity and responsiveness of the DMIST tool were supported by a sufficient rating based on evidence quality. This scoping review provides an overview of the measurement properties of available assessment tools for diabetic foot ulcers.
METHODS: This literature review, which is part of a scoping study framework, searched electronic databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar to find papers relevant to the Indonesian context. Five papers were chosen from a total of 463 papers discovered.
RESULTS: The diabetic foot ulcer wound assessment tools DFUAS (diabetic foot ulcer assessment scale), DMIST (deep, maceration, infection, size, and tunneling), and MUNGS (maceration, undermining, necrotic, granulation, and symptoms/signs) were identified in the literature review. For leg ulcers, LUMT (leg ulcer measurement tool) and RESVECH 2.0 (Results Expected from Chronic Wound Healing Assessment) were used. DMIST, DFUAS, and MUNGS are used to predict healed and non-healing wounds. LUMT determines the evaluation and documentation of leg ulcers, and RESVECH 2.0 is designed to shorten the duration of chronic wound occurrence. The psychometric properties of the DMIST scale were identified, including reliability, validity, and responsiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: Five tools for assessing chronic wounds were identified. The predictive validity and responsiveness of the DMIST tool were supported by a sufficient rating based on evidence quality. This scoping review provides an overview of the measurement properties of available assessment tools for diabetic foot ulcers.