Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2025
Evolving cystic fibrosis care models in the modulator era.
СтатьяОбзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Martin Isaac, Ratjen Felix, Flume Patrick
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The advent of CFTR modulators and the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted reconsideration of cystic fibrosis (CF) care models. This review explores how care delivery may evolve in response to these changes.
RECENT FINDINGS: Emerging evidence highlights the heterogeneity in response to CFTR modulators, with some patients continuing to experience disease progression. Preliminary trial data have explored therapy de-escalation, but long-term safety remains uncertain. Challenges in microbiological surveillance, particularly due to reduced sputum production, complicate monitoring. Early efforts to define "stability" have led to position statements advocating risk-stratified, hybrid care models.
SUMMARY: CF care models should shift toward individualized, flexible approaches that prioritize equity and safety. Clinical trials and registry analyses will be essential to validate such models. Until then, conservative implementation with continued multidisciplinary support and objective monitoring are advised.
RECENT FINDINGS: Emerging evidence highlights the heterogeneity in response to CFTR modulators, with some patients continuing to experience disease progression. Preliminary trial data have explored therapy de-escalation, but long-term safety remains uncertain. Challenges in microbiological surveillance, particularly due to reduced sputum production, complicate monitoring. Early efforts to define "stability" have led to position statements advocating risk-stratified, hybrid care models.
SUMMARY: CF care models should shift toward individualized, flexible approaches that prioritize equity and safety. Clinical trials and registry analyses will be essential to validate such models. Until then, conservative implementation with continued multidisciplinary support and objective monitoring are advised.