Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
Comparative evaluation of supervised and unsupervised deep learning strategies for denoising hyperpolarized 129Xe lung MRI.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bdaiwi Abdullah S, Willmering Matthew M, Hussain Riaz, Hysinger Erik, Woods Jason C, Walkup Laura L, Cleveland Zackary I
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in hyperpolarized 129Xe MR images can affect accurate quantification for research and diagnostic evaluations. Thus, this study explores the application of supervised deep learning (DL) denoising, traditional (Trad) and Noise2Noise (N2N) and unsupervised Noise2void (N2V) approaches for 129Xe MR imaging.
METHODS: The DL denoising frameworks were trained and tested on 952 129Xe MRI data sets (421 ventilation, 125 diffusion-weighted, and 406 gas-exchange acquisitions) from healthy subjects and participants with cardiopulmonary conditions and compared with the block matching 3D denoising technique. Evaluation involved mean signal, noise standard deviation (SD), SNR, and sharpness. Ventilation defect percentage (VDP), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), membrane uptake, red blood cell (RBC) transfer, and RBC:Membrane were also evaluated for ventilation, diffusion, and gas-exchange images, respectively.
RESULTS: Denoising methods significantly reduced noise SDs and enhanced SNR (p < 0.05) across all imaging types. Traditional ventilation model (Tradvent) improved sharpness in ventilation images but underestimated VDP (bias = -1.37%) relative to raw images, whereas N2Nvent overestimated VDP (bias = +1.88%). Block matching 3D and N2Vvent showed minimal VDP bias (≤ 0.35%). Denoising significantly reduced ADC mean and SD (p < 0.05, bias ≤ - 0.63 × 10-2). The values of Tradvent and N2Nvent increased mean membrane and RBC (p < 0.001) with no change in RBC:Membrane. Denoising also reduced SDs of all gas-exchange metrics (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Low SNR may impair the potential of 129Xe MRI for clinical diagnosis and lung function assessment. The evaluation of supervised and unsupervised DL denoising methods enhanced 129Xe imaging quality, offering promise for improved clinical interpretation and diagnosis.
METHODS: The DL denoising frameworks were trained and tested on 952 129Xe MRI data sets (421 ventilation, 125 diffusion-weighted, and 406 gas-exchange acquisitions) from healthy subjects and participants with cardiopulmonary conditions and compared with the block matching 3D denoising technique. Evaluation involved mean signal, noise standard deviation (SD), SNR, and sharpness. Ventilation defect percentage (VDP), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), membrane uptake, red blood cell (RBC) transfer, and RBC:Membrane were also evaluated for ventilation, diffusion, and gas-exchange images, respectively.
RESULTS: Denoising methods significantly reduced noise SDs and enhanced SNR (p < 0.05) across all imaging types. Traditional ventilation model (Tradvent) improved sharpness in ventilation images but underestimated VDP (bias = -1.37%) relative to raw images, whereas N2Nvent overestimated VDP (bias = +1.88%). Block matching 3D and N2Vvent showed minimal VDP bias (≤ 0.35%). Denoising significantly reduced ADC mean and SD (p < 0.05, bias ≤ - 0.63 × 10-2). The values of Tradvent and N2Nvent increased mean membrane and RBC (p < 0.001) with no change in RBC:Membrane. Denoising also reduced SDs of all gas-exchange metrics (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Low SNR may impair the potential of 129Xe MRI for clinical diagnosis and lung function assessment. The evaluation of supervised and unsupervised DL denoising methods enhanced 129Xe imaging quality, offering promise for improved clinical interpretation and diagnosis.