MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/15209156251368933

Медицинская библиотека · Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2025

Accuracy of Dexcom G6 Pro Continuous Glucose Monitor in the Intensive Care Setting: TIGHT ICU G6 Study.

Ullal Jagdeesh, Spanbauer Charles, Baran Jesica D, Bais Rajlaxmi, Chiang Hou-Hsien, Chao Jing H, Khakpour Dori, Panfil Patrisia, Pasquel Francisco J, Gligorijevic Nikola, Jones Morgan S, Low Wang Cecilia C, Buse John B, Draznin Boris, Sibayan Judy, Kollman Craig, Beck Roy W, Hirsch Irl B, TIGHT RCT Study Group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Pro continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational, multicenter study in adult ICU patients with a known diagnosis of diabetes or stress hyperglycemia who were being treated with insulin. Two Dexcom G6 Pro sensors were placed. Sensor accuracy was assessed by pairing sensor and blood glucose (BG) measurements obtained as a part of usual ICU care. Accuracy of the G6 Pro also was assessed concurrently in non-ICU hospitalized individuals.

RESULTS

A total of 130 participants were enrolled, with mean (±SD) age of 62 ± 12 years, and preexisting diabetes was present in 73% and stress hyperglycemia in 27%. A total of 9120 sensor-BG pairs were analyzed. The mean relative absolute difference (RAD) was 23% (median 19%), with a mean difference of +25 mg/dL (median 25 mg/dL). Forty-one percent of sensor glucose values were within 15% of BG values for BG values ≥100 mg/dL or within 15 mg/dL of BG values for BG values <100 mg/dL, 53% within 20%/20 mg/dL, and 72% within 30%/30 mg/dL. For the two sensors worn simultaneously, the mean absolute difference was 24 mg/dL (median 19 mg/dL) and the mean RAD was 14% (median 11%). In the non-ICU setting (N = 60; 1318 sensor-BG pairs), the mean difference was 24 mg/dL (median 21 mg/dL) and the mean RAD was 21% (median 17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Pro sensor in the ICU setting was worse than has previously been reported for this sensor, with sensor values tending to be biased high. However, this appears to be a function of the G6 Pro sensor and not the setting as similar results were obtained in a non-ICU setting. Results should not be generalized to the real-time G6 or other sensors.

Для цитирования: Ullal Jagdeesh, Spanbauer Charles, Baran Jesica D, Bais Rajlaxmi, Chiang Hou-Hsien, Chao Jing H, Khakpour Dori, Panfil Patrisia, Pasquel Francisco J, Gligorijevic Nikola, Jones Morgan S, Low Wang Cecilia C, Buse John B, Draznin Boris, Sibayan Judy, Kollman Craig, Beck Roy W, Hirsch Irl B, TIGHT RCT Study Group. Accuracy of Dexcom G6 Pro Continuous Glucose Monitor in the Intensive Care Setting: TIGHT ICU G6 Study.. Diabetes technology & therapeutics. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/15209156251368933.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.