Annals of gastroenterology · 2025
Patients with cystic fibrosis do not have an increased risk of adverse events after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a propensity-matched analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Madi Mahmoud Y, Alsakarneh Saqr, Kilani Yassine, Plunkett Ryan, Aburumman Razan, Heis Farah, Nguyen Christopher, Hachem Christine, Kiwan Wissam
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common life-limiting genetic disease often associated with hepatobiliary complications. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), though valuable, carries procedural risks. We assessed the safety of ERCP in CF patients using real-world data.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database (2010-2024) identified adults (≥18 years) with CF who underwent ERCP. Propensity-score matching adjusted for confounders, including age, sex, race, and hospitalization history. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP); secondary outcomes included bleeding and infection. Subgroup analysis evaluated outcomes in patients with choledocholithiasis.
RESULTS: Among 534 matched CF patients (mean age 44.6 years; 48.3% female), rates of PEP (8.3% vs. 4.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.937-3.315; P=0.075), bleeding (3.1% vs. 2.1%, aOR 1.52, 95%CI 0.674-3.409; P=0.31), and infection (3.7% vs. 2.4%, aOR 1.55, 95%CI 0.638-3.785; P=0.33) were not significantly different compared to non-CF controls. Subgroup analysis of choledocholithiasis patients similarly showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: ERCP in CF patients demonstrated comparable adverse event rates to non-CF controls. These findings support the procedural safety of ERCP in this population, though further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and clarify risk by indication.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database (2010-2024) identified adults (≥18 years) with CF who underwent ERCP. Propensity-score matching adjusted for confounders, including age, sex, race, and hospitalization history. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP); secondary outcomes included bleeding and infection. Subgroup analysis evaluated outcomes in patients with choledocholithiasis.
RESULTS: Among 534 matched CF patients (mean age 44.6 years; 48.3% female), rates of PEP (8.3% vs. 4.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.937-3.315; P=0.075), bleeding (3.1% vs. 2.1%, aOR 1.52, 95%CI 0.674-3.409; P=0.31), and infection (3.7% vs. 2.4%, aOR 1.55, 95%CI 0.638-3.785; P=0.33) were not significantly different compared to non-CF controls. Subgroup analysis of choledocholithiasis patients similarly showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: ERCP in CF patients demonstrated comparable adverse event rates to non-CF controls. These findings support the procedural safety of ERCP in this population, though further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and clarify risk by indication.