Introduction
Plasmablastic myeloma is an uncommon and aggressive morphologic variant of plasma cell myeloma. In a classic morphologic series, the plasmablastic subtype accounted for 15% of untreated myeloma cases and was associated with markedly shorter survival than other morphologic subtypes [ 1 ]. Diagnostic difficulty is greatest when plasmablastic morphology presents as a solitary oral or maxillofacial mass, because plasmablastic myeloma and plasmablastic lymphoma share large-cell morphology, loss of pan-B-cell markers, and expression of plasma cell-associated antigens [ 2 - 6 ].
Accurate classification therefore requires integrated clinical, serologic, radiologic, and pathologic assessment. Features favoring plasmablastic myeloma include marrow-based plasma cell disease, a monoclonal serum immunoglobulin, myeloma-associated cytogenetic abnormalities, and cyclin D1 expression in an appropriate context, whereas oral cavity predilection, immunodeficiency, Epstein-Barr virus association, and MYC-related biology more often favor plasmablastic lymphoma, although exceptions and overlap are well recognized [ 2 - 7 ]. Clonal plasma cell neoplasms usually show either kappa or lambda light-chain restriction because of allelic exclusion. Accordingly, dual kappa and lambda expression is exceptionally rare and has been reported only in isolated case reports and small series [ 8 - 10 ].
We report an unusual case of plasmablastic myeloma initially presenting as a solitary hard palate tumor in which protein-level light-chain staining was misleading, whereas RNA in situ hybridization disclosed dual kappa and lambda light-chain messenger RNA expression. The case illustrates how transcript-based light-chain testing can refine diagnosis when a plasmablastic oral lesion raises concern for plasmablastic lymphoma.
Case presentation
A Japanese woman in her 80s with a remote history of cervical cancer treated by total hysterectomy in her forties presented with swelling of the left hard palate. She had no regular medications, no known allergies, no smoking or alcohol history, and no family history of hematologic disease.
She initially noticed a left hard palate and maxillary swelling several months before hospital admission. The symptoms temporarily improved after dental treatment, but subsequently recurred and progressed. She underwent surgical resection of a hard palate and maxillary tumor with multiple tooth extractions at an outside hospital.
Histologic examination of the oral lesion showed diffuse sheets of large plasmablastic cells with prominent nucleoli. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated plasma cell differentiation with CD138 positivity and immunoglobulin G positivity, with loss of B-cell markers. CD20 was negative, and CD79a was negative on subsequent staining. Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization was negative. Light-chain immunohistochemistry in the oral lesion was not definitively restrictive, showing only weak lambda staining and negative kappa staining. No additional extramedullary lesions were identified clinically at that time.
Within weeks of surgery, the patient developed malaise, nausea, and rapidly progressive cytopenias and was referred to our institution. On admission, vital signs were stable, chest examination was unremarkable, and the hard palate tumor had already been resected with no apparent residual mass.
Key admission laboratory findings are summarized in Table 1 .
Table 1
Key laboratory findings at admission HHV-8: human herpesvirus 8; HIV-1: human immunodeficiency virus type 1; HTLV-1: human T-cell leukemia virus type 1; Ig: immunoglobulin.
| Hemoglobin | 6.5 g/dL | 14-18 g/dL | Severe anemia |
| Lactate dehydrogenase | 1,739 U/L | 124–222 U/L | Markedly elevated |
| Albumin | 3.3 g/dL | 4.1–5.1 g/dL | Low |
| IgG | 4,409 mg/dL | 861–1,747 mg/dL | Markedly elevated |
| IgA | 10 mg/dL | 93–393 mg/dL | Suppressed |
| IgM | 8 mg/dL | 50–269 mg/dL | Suppressed |
| Free kappa light chain | 27.1 mg/L | 3.3–19.4 mg/L | Mildly elevated |
| Free lambda light chain | 1,137 mg/L | 5.7–26.3 mg/L | Markedly elevated |
| Kappa/lambda ratio | 0.02 | 0.26–1.65 | Markedly decreased |
| Beta-2 microglobulin | 7.8 mg/L | 0.9–2.0 mg/L | Elevated |
| HIV-1 serology | Negative | Negative | No evidence of HIV infection |
| HTLV-1 serology | Negative | Negative | No evidence of HTLV-1 infection |
| HHV-8 serology | Negative | Negative | No evidence of HHV-8 infection |
The patient had pancytopenia, markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase, hypoalbuminemia, marked IgG elevation with immunoparesis, and striking lambda-predominant free light-chain excess. Viral serologies, including human immunodeficiency virus type 1, human T-cell leukemia virus type 1, and human herpesvirus 8, were negative.
A skeletal survey did not show overt lytic lesions. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography demonstrated diffuse fluorodeoxyglucose uptake throughout the skeleton and diffuse splenic uptake, consistent with systemic myeloma involvement (Figure 1 ).

Importantly, no additional extramedullary lesions were detected beyond the previously resected hard palate tumor, supporting that the oral tumor represented the only extramedullary site.
Bone marrow aspirate and clot sections showed a markedly hypercellular marrow, with approximately 90% cellularity, extensively replaced by large plasmablastic plasma cells. The neoplastic cells expressed CD38 and CD138 and were positive for multiple myeloma oncogene 1. Cyclin D1 was positive. Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA in situ hybridization and anaplastic lymphoma kinase were negative. Flow cytometry demonstrated very low surface immunoglobulin expression overall, with small fractions showing surface light-chain signals, including surface kappa in 0.2% and surface lambda in 6.3% of cells within the relevant gate, consistent with clonal plasmablastic differentiation.
A central diagnostic feature of this case was the discrepancy between light-chain detection at the protein and messenger RNA levels. Protein-level immunohistochemistry showed absent kappa staining in neoplastic plasma cells and lambda positivity in only a small subset of tumor cells, approximately 5%. In contrast, RNA in situ hybridization for immunoglobulin light chains demonstrated dual light-chain messenger RNA expression, with kappa messenger RNA in approximately 70% and lambda messenger RNA in approximately 80% of tumor cells (Figure 2 ). Thus, the tumor showed widespread transcription of both light-chain genes despite minimal detectable light-chain protein by immunohistochemistry.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, including 1q21 amplification involving CKS1B in 21%, deletion of 17p13, del(17p13), involving TP53 in 25%, and immunoglobulin heavy chain/MAF rearrangement in 31.5%, while immunoglobulin heavy chain/FGFR3 rearrangement was negative. Conventional karyotyping showed t(7;8)(p12;q24.1) and complex karyotypes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for MYC was not performed.
The integrated findings favored plasmablastic myeloma rather than plasmablastic lymphoma. Specifically, the patient had extensive marrow replacement by plasmablastic plasma cells, a prominent serum IgG monoclonal component with lambda-predominant free light-chain secretion, cyclin D1 positivity, EBER negativity, and myeloma-associated high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. These key diagnostic features are summarized in Table 2 .
Table 2
Integrated findings supporting plasmablastic myeloma in the differential diagnosis
| Diagnostic domain | Finding in the present case | Interpretation |
| Clinical pattern | Rapid systemic deterioration after resection of a solitary hard palate lesion | Suggests that the oral lesion was part of disseminated plasma cell disease rather than isolated lymphoma |
| Serum studies | IgG 4,409 mg/dL with marked immunoparesis and lambda-predominant free light-chain excess | Strongly supports a secretory plasma cell neoplasm |
| Imaging | Diffuse skeletal and splenic FDG uptake without other soft-tissue lesions | Supports systemic myeloma with a solitary extramedullary oral site |
| Bone marrow | Markedly hypercellular marrow extensively replaced by plasmablastic plasma cells | Favors marrow-based plasma cell myeloma |
| Plasma cell markers | CD38+, CD138+, MUM1+ | Consistent with plasmacytic differentiation |
| Lymphoma-associated exclusions | CD20-, CD79a-, ALK-, EBER-ISH negative | Makes classic oral plasmablastic lymphoma less likely in this context |
| Additional supportive marker | Cyclin D1 positive | Supports plasma cell myeloma in the clinicopathologic setting |
| Light-chain studies | Kappa IHC absent, lambda IHC focal, but dual kappa/lambda mRNA expression by RNA-ISH | Demonstrates that protein-level staining was misleading and that transcript-based testing added diagnostic value |
| Cytogenetics | 1q21 amplification, del(17p13), IGH/MAF rearrangement | Supports high-risk myeloma biology |
Because of rapid clinical and biochemical progression, high-dose dexamethasone was initiated. The patient then sequentially received daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone, but the disease progressed. Therapy was changed to isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone, with carfilzomib dose reduction because of concern for toxicity, but progression continued. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone were then started, again without response. Because the disease was refractory after exposure to a proteasome inhibitor, anti-CD38 antibody therapies, and an immunomodulatory drug, B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody therapy with elranatamab was initiated with step-up dosing. Cytokine release syndrome was limited to transient grade 1 fever without significant neurotoxicity, but there was no meaningful biochemical or clinical response. Supportive care included transfusions and denosumab for skeletal-related complications and hypercalcemia risk. A central venous port was placed but was complicated by hematoma, limiting its use. The treatment sequence, clinical rationale, response assessment, and toxicities are summarized in Table 3 .
Table 3
Treatment course, rationale, response, and toxicity
| Approximate timing | Regimen | Clinical rationale | Response / reason for discontinuation | Toxicity / complication |
| Immediately after diagnosis | High-dose dexamethasone | Rapid cytoreduction in fulminant plasmablastic disease | Inadequate disease control | No specific major toxicity documented |
| First myeloma regimen | Daratumumab + bortezomib + dexamethasone | Standard anti-CD38/proteasome inhibitor-based urgent therapy | Progressive disease | No regimen-limiting organ-specific toxicity documented before progression |
| Second myeloma regimen | Isatuximab + carfilzomib + dexamethasone | Escalation after early progression on prior anti-CD38/proteasome inhibitor-based approach | Progressive disease | Carfilzomib dose reduction for anticipated frailty-related cardiorenal risk; no clear documented severe carfilzomib-specific event before progression |
| Third regimen | Lenalidomide + dexamethasone | Addition of IMiD class after refractory disease | No meaningful response | No major new regimen-limiting toxicity documented |
| Salvage immunotherapy | Elranatamab with step-up dosing | BCMA-directed therapy after multi-class refractory disease | No meaningful biochemical or clinical response | Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome with transient fever; no significant neurotoxicity |
Despite intensive therapy and supportive measures, the disease remained refractory and rapidly progressive. The patient died 45 days after diagnosis.
The clinical course proceeded as follows. Initial oral symptoms developed several months before admission, and the oral lesion subsequently progressed. The hard palate tumor was resected before referral. Systemic evaluation and bone marrow sampling were performed on postoperative day 21, hospital admission and diagnostic confirmation occurred on postoperative day 23, high-dose dexamethasone began on postoperative day 24, sequential myeloma regimens were administered from postoperative day 27, B-cell maturation antigen-directed bispecific therapy began on postoperative day 52, and the patient died on postoperative day 68.
The postoperative clinical course is summarized in Figure 3 .

Discussion
This case highlights two related diagnostic problems: first, the challenge of distinguishing plasmablastic myeloma from plasmablastic lymphoma when the presenting lesion is a solitary oral mass; and second, the value of RNA-based light-chain testing when protein-level assays are weak or discordant.
The oral cavity is a classic site of presentation for plasmablastic lymphoma, and oral/maxillofacial plasmablastic lesions require careful differential diagnosis [ 5 - 7 , 11 , 12 ]. Prior reports have also documented hard palate plasmablastic myeloma, including an extraskeletal palatal plasmablastic myeloma reported by Kumar et al. [ 13 ]. Compared with that previously reported palatal case, the present patient was substantially older and showed diffuse marrow replacement, secretory IgG-lambda disease, and extremely rapid fatal progression over only 45 days after diagnosis. These features strongly supported systemic plasmablastic myeloma with a solitary extramedullary hard palate manifestation rather than primary oral plasmablastic lymphoma.
RNA in situ hybridization was particularly important in this case because protein-level light-chain staining was misleading. Bright-field RNA-based assays for kappa and lambda transcripts have been shown to improve assessment of B-cell clonality in tissue and cytology specimens, especially when conventional immunohistochemistry is weak or noncontributory [ 14 , 15 ]. In diagnostically difficult plasmablastic neoplasms, demonstration of light-chain expression can materially affect classification, because light-chain-restricted lesions may align more closely with plasma cell neoplasia than with “true” plasmablastic lymphoma in some settings [ 6 ]. In the present case, RNA in situ hybridization did not merely confirm clonality; it disclosed biologically unusual dual kappa and lambda light-chain transcription that was not evident on immunohistochemistry and that helped explain the discrepancy between tissue staining and serum studies.
The adverse clinical course was most likely driven by the aggregate high-risk biology of the disease rather than by lambda predominance itself. Plasmablastic morphology has long been associated with aggressive behavior [ 1 ]. In addition, this patient had extramedullary disease, markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase, 1q21 amplification, del(17p13), and IGH/MAF rearrangement, all of which are features associated with high-risk multiple myeloma and treatment resistance [ 16 - 20 ]. Recent data further suggest that extramedullary disease, particularly soft-tissue disease independent of bone, confers inferior outcomes even in the era of modern therapy [ 19 ]. Accordingly, the lambda-dominant secretory pattern in this case should be interpreted as a descriptive biologic feature rather than the principal explanation for the poor outcome.
Overall, this case emphasizes that solitary oral plasmablastic lesions should not be diagnosed on morphology alone. Integrated clinicopathological evaluation, including serum monoclonal protein studies, bone marrow assessment, EBV testing, cyclin D1, and, where needed, transcript-based light-chain testing, is critical for correct classification.
Conclusions
Plasmablastic myeloma can present as a solitary hard palate tumor and may closely mimic plasmablastic lymphoma. In this case, light-chain immunohistochemistry was misleading, whereas RNA in situ hybridization demonstrated dual kappa and lambda messenger RNA expression and materially strengthened diagnostic interpretation. When evaluating oral or maxillary plasmablastic lesions, integrated clinicopathological correlation is essential, and RNA-based light-chain testing should be considered when protein-level assays are weak, negative, or discordant with serum findings.
Acknowledgments
Ken Tanaka was supported by the 2023–2024 Quad Fellowship, an initiative of the governments of Australia, India, Japan, and the United States. We thank the Quad Fellowship for its support of this project.
Funding Statement
This study was supported in part by the 2023-2024 Quad Fellowship to KT, the Grant of Japan Health Research Promotion Bureau Project Fund (JHP2025-B-02), JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number: 22K08518, 25K11680) and the Research Funding for Longevity Sciences (25-11) from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology to AK.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Institutional Review Boards issued approval 1835. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Institutional Review Boards (No. 1835).
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: This study was supported in part by the 2023-2024 Quad Fellowship to KT, the Grant of Japan Health Research Promotion Bureau Project Fund (JHP2025-B-02), JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number: 22K08518, 25K11680) and the Research Funding for Longevity Sciences (25-11) from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology to AK.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Akira Katsumi, Ken Tanaka, Masaki Hasegawa
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Akira Katsumi, Ken Tanaka, Masaki Hasegawa
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Akira Katsumi, Ken Tanaka, Masaki Hasegawa
Supervision: Akira Katsumi, Masaki Hasegawa
Drafting of the manuscript: Ken Tanaka
References
1. Multiple myeloma: significance of plasmablastic subtype in morphological classification. Greipp PR, Raymond NM, Kyle RA, O’Fallon WM. https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/778769/1-s2.0-S0006497120X7563X/1-s2.0-S0006497120836738/main.pdf?X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEKn%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaCXVzLWVhc3QtMSJHMEUCIG6bSHEj8NOi1JebXmjbLyUUzoZfRMnmgSHiDRF20ALtAiEAyVnnS6%2F6XWsBl1U%2Ba1gtVFS8JrswVrxHidw%2FdV3BMeYqswUIcRAFGgwwNTkwMDM1NDY4NjUiDB%2FqLmQM365S4QdzfyqQBRg06xGNYrFNoHWSpLDlTU44mDLIovba7IesI%2BiRd51saK44kvyqSmIdSJd4Q8cFU56MJHt18X1q%2FJOpXYFnKetjfCcpHIbjrOXNVR35JolmJblpS1UwoVi%2FAERw5LRqf2rajCEhPG61LC3SOuP3PuMendlJc21Imt6jbL2X2iWkFG56FJjbfldJNushBvIJdammNMAMA0%2FiG8L7fQSyPSaWA2QSnLy3SEhTNY%2FjJSpc0fNeIjZRJzBBwowBe8o7nIYFirdbz%2BIyqR6JxSry%2B2W7IE6%2FjQTIiT0FGTb5OzQf9m%2BcDToyZ7UrkopLzVY8vWMKluum%2BU7zonRNMxoWv9HWdxrZd9kdyonvnSYdfbF%2BdzVljmkhfmM%2Fk7H7Oxtg%2FDIJCLzECDqasby1a4j%2BriGF%2Bc9RSmQYQR7beKd4NwnnUrx5JPg2QC4DwyseeKBtufF2Q1EWMvQuNGrZfwCKAktbHm%2FXweVBoywwLJerUYirRnF0blwpjr455mnS1BLLOpK6%2BjAEUwNuihQhAI41HVpQAlUbQWhwAJ2qJkEQWh%2FWYgMLdmUQ7clhEqFk5vWDVqhgJV4LR9KnHS20E7UlGvIiEstjNcmmxjX7IT1HPjhi0V1yopD0f1hvtQbMXdFDRXcxMSRVfkx0k%2BUjknNuuIAXQFF9tTs15LTyVVuoWPxuOl7zgSqTnaO9NemxWf7qnb%2BrX4eRmSD2THRKDUFb%2B0P8O%2FWQ36bOcqgjRLvNxhEkxulevNHMo3Xkr3CvVfX0J%2BcaKLjrYs0nJeQ0cvCVjGV%2BAWdfkFYPrTnYtEx%2FofaQfQYE2UvdBTJ%2BZnHT53Iep1SPE16RbXGKGmAcLd8h6K38CGas1GCDzfD7tPZXkQ3xMIWtm9AGOrEBZqQJ5jljmTOtxL4%2BTPCFWIkKEafRTzwmWFb22l5jZbxxiQPDnBvAiDc7kcoYxHrhSK6WK8Bq5AT3UD5i%2BuR%2Boclz3qgSwtMZ781Xqi2MDqsgnfrs1JfGQZVGvU2puJ38lVfPMsDZh2IurYYNvPhxrNNtUZnXVPmB529dJGC0BxzgfdIwPX28xKnz9TPb0lsLevTQfWSoE7VCDXSGPjUR1lJS6kG2j6e6rewPT%2FbxpB5%2B&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20260515T090719Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAQ3PHCVTY4Y2JBUKI%2F20260515%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=8764bac1a1e08adeaff58ae688c7945f106e59a9d53fd86bff5e231969fa4d37&hash=71e45ed327e5debbd2b88b87ed4f491f5b58b6cfc92a46008274da91840c0950&host=68042c943591013ac2b2430a89b270f6af2c76d8dfd086a07176afe7c76c2c61&pii=S0006497120836738&tid=spdf-88783b76-7859-435f-9a94-d410a58bdcaf&sid=eac19f5c2a29e245dc78cb523662ed986789gxrqa&type=client&tsoh=d3d3LnNjaWVuY2VkaXJlY3QuY29t&rh=d3d3LnNjaWVuY2VkaXJlY3QuY29t&ua=101357070d5e080b0a58&rr=9fc0fdd78b939665&cc=jp . Blood. 1985;65:305–310.
2. Plasma cell myeloma and related neoplasms. Lorsbach RB, Hsi ED, Dogan A, Fend F. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:168–182. doi: 10.1309/AJCPENJ68FFBRIYB.
3. Aggressive presentation of plasmablastic myeloma. Suarez-Londono JA, Rohatgi A, Antoine-Pepeljugoski C, Braunstein MJ. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:0. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-234436.
4. Rare case of plasmablastic myeloma diagnosed on lung biopsy. Ayeboa-Sallah B, Qutab S, Grace R, Sharma N. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14 doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-240998.
5. Plasmablastic lymphoma: an update. Bailly J, Jenkins N, Chetty D, Mohamed Z, Verburgh ER, Opie JJ. Int J Lab Hematol. 2022;44:54–63. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13863.
6. Lymphoid neoplasms of the oral cavity with plasmablastic morphology-a case series and review of the literature. Bhattacharyya S, Bains AP, Sykes DL, Iverson BR, Sibgatullah R, Kuklani RM. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;128:651–659. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.08.001.
7. Oral plasmablastic lymphoma: a case report. Zizzo M, Zanelli M, Martiniani R, et al. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022335.
8. Plasma cell myeloma with dual expression of kappa and lambda light chains. Jiang AS, Wu Z, Wei EX, Ni H, You B, Yang T, Jiang JG. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6962953/pdf/ijcep0011-4718.pdf . Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11:4718–4723.
9. A case of solitary plasmacytoma of bone showing co-expression of both immunoglobulin light chains. Matsuoka R, Sakamoto N, Kato T, Chiba S, Noguchi M. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26:148. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00621-8.
10. Dual expression of immunoglobulin light chains in plasma cell myeloma: a case report and literature review. Suresh J, Wu Y, Sabaratnam R, Brijlall S, Kyle B, Torlakovic EE. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2023;31:447–451. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000001069.
11. Plasmablastic lymphomas with light chain restriction - plasmablastic extramedullary plasmacytomas? Boy SC, van Heerden MB, Raubenheimer EJ, van Heerden WF. J Oral Pathol Med. 2010;39:435–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2009.00874.x.
12. An aggressive plasmablastic lymphoma of the oral cavity as primary manifestation of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: case report and literature review. Corti M, Minué G, Campitelli A, Narbaitz M, Gilardi L. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;19:354–358. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1397335.
13. Extra-skeletal plasmablastic myeloma presenting as palatal growth - An unusual entity. Kumar S, Bhutani N, Bhargawa S, Kataria SP, Sen R. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;41:423–426. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.11.023.
14. Kappa and lambda light chain mRNA in situ hybridization compared to flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry in B cell lymphomas. Rimsza LM, Day WA, McGinn S, et al. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9:144. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-144.
15. Branched-chain in situ hybridization for κ and λ light chains: a powerful ancillary technique for determining B-cell clonality in cytology samples. Arora K, Chebib I, Zukerberg L, Gandhi M, Rivera M, Ting D, Deshpande V. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016;124:203–212. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21629.
16. The prognostic role of 1q21 gain/amplification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The faster, the worse. Wang Y, Xu J, Xu B, et al. Cancer. 2023;129:1005–1016. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34641.
17. del(17p) without TP53 mutation confers a poor prognosis in intensively treated newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Corre J, Perrot A, Caillot D, et al. Blood. 2021;137:1192–1195. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020008346.
18. MAF translocation remains a strong prognostic factor despite concurrent chromosomal abnormalities. Liu Y, Lv R, Yan W, et al. Haematologica. 2024;109:1619–1623. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.284666.
19. Multiple extramedullary-bone related and/or extramedullary extraosseous are independent poor prognostic factors in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. He J, Yue X, He D, et al. Front Oncol. 2021;11:668099. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.668099.
20. Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Rajkumar SV. Am J Hematol. 2024;99:1802–1824. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27422.