MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.05.005

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2005

Recurrent Candida tropicalis meningitis.

Dawson Nancy L, Robles Hector A, Alvarez Salvador

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Candida meningitis, a previously rare occurrence, has been increasing in prevalence and often is a result of complications of neurosurgery. We describe the case of a 49-year-old man who presented with headache, vertigo, intermittent blurred vision, and multiple episodes of nausea and vomiting. Computed tomography (CT) showed a left cerebellar hemorrhage with obliteration of the fourth ventricle causing hydrocephalus. He had an occipital craniotomy with transcondylar evacuation of the hemorrhage and placement of a temporary ventriculostomy. The hospital stay was prolonged because of postsurgical complications, and Candida tropicalis meningitis developed. Treatment was started with 400 mg of fluconazole administered intravenously every 12 h. In vitro susceptibility testing showed a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to fluconazole of 1 microg/mL. Fluconazole was therefore continued orally for a total of 60 days, and the patient remained asymptomatic for 2 years. He then presented with increased vertigo and ataxia. Cerebrospinal fluid cultures grew C. tropicalis, which again showed susceptibility to fluconazole with a MIC of 1 microg/mL, identical to that in the previous infection. However, a second course of fluconazole failed to control the infection despite adequate cerebrospinal fluid levels.

Для цитирования: Dawson Nancy L, Robles Hector A, Alvarez Salvador. Recurrent Candida tropicalis meningitis.. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.05.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.