Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2004
Combination therapy for invasive mycoses: evaluation of past clinical trial designs.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sobel Jack D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of new antifungals, single-agent therapy frequently falls short of high cure rates. Combination therapy offers potentially higher cure rates, especially for resistant organisms. In vitro studies and experimental animal models have provided conflicting data.
METHODS: Retrospective, randomized, controlled clinical studies were reviewed.
RESULTS: Results indicate a clear advantage for polyene and flucytosine combination therapy in cryptococcal meningitis and a possible advantage for combination amphotericin B and fluconazole for candidemia. Unfortunately, the few studies published have been flawed by design problems that have compromised the determination of outcome. Study review allows investigators the opportunity to design future studies to ensure optimal evaluation of efficacy.
CONCLUSION: Combination antifungal therapy is advantageous in cryptococcal diseases and may have a role in the treatment of invasive candidiasis. The greatest potential exists for combination therapy against aspergillosis and resistant fungi in patients with refractory mycotic disease who experience failure of monotherapy.
METHODS: Retrospective, randomized, controlled clinical studies were reviewed.
RESULTS: Results indicate a clear advantage for polyene and flucytosine combination therapy in cryptococcal meningitis and a possible advantage for combination amphotericin B and fluconazole for candidemia. Unfortunately, the few studies published have been flawed by design problems that have compromised the determination of outcome. Study review allows investigators the opportunity to design future studies to ensure optimal evaluation of efficacy.
CONCLUSION: Combination antifungal therapy is advantageous in cryptococcal diseases and may have a role in the treatment of invasive candidiasis. The greatest potential exists for combination therapy against aspergillosis and resistant fungi in patients with refractory mycotic disease who experience failure of monotherapy.