Gynecologic oncology · 2014
Metformin and the risk of endometrial cancer: a population-based cohort study.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ko Emily M, Stürmer Til, Hong Jin-Liern, Castillo Wendy Camelo, Bae-Jump Victoria, Funk Michele Jonsson
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: While some observational studies have suggested a protective effect of metformin on incident cancer, concerns about potential bias remain. We compared the incidence of endometrial cancer in metformin versus sulfonylurea initiators. Research design and methods We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using US healthcare claims (MarketScan®), 2000-2011. We identified new users of metformin versus sulfonylureas with no prior cancer diagnoses and followed them until a diagnosis of endometrial cancer, hysterectomy, treatment change, or disenrollment. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Cox proportional hazards, using an as-treated analytic approach. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights were used to adjust for potential confounding at baseline.
RESULTS: Of 541,128 eligible women, 456,838 (84%) initiated metformin and 84,290 (16%) initiated sulfonylurea. The treatment groups differed at baseline in terms of age and recent diagnosis codes for diabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and endometrial hyperplasia. Over a median follow-up of 1.2 (IQR 0.4-2.3) years and a total of 2,030,914 person-years, 729 women developed endometrial cancer. Metformin initiation was associated with a lower risk of endometrial cancer in the unadjusted analysis (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97). However, after balancing baseline covariates across groups, metformin was not associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88-1.35). This finding was consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses in diabetic patients and relevant age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort of >500,000 women, initiating metformin compared with sulfonylureas was not associated with a reduced risk of developing endometrial cancer.
RESULTS: Of 541,128 eligible women, 456,838 (84%) initiated metformin and 84,290 (16%) initiated sulfonylurea. The treatment groups differed at baseline in terms of age and recent diagnosis codes for diabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and endometrial hyperplasia. Over a median follow-up of 1.2 (IQR 0.4-2.3) years and a total of 2,030,914 person-years, 729 women developed endometrial cancer. Metformin initiation was associated with a lower risk of endometrial cancer in the unadjusted analysis (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97). However, after balancing baseline covariates across groups, metformin was not associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88-1.35). This finding was consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses in diabetic patients and relevant age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort of >500,000 women, initiating metformin compared with sulfonylureas was not associated with a reduced risk of developing endometrial cancer.