MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0296708

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2024

Field assessment of the operating procedures of a semi-quantitative G6PD Biosensor to improve repeatability of routine testing.

Sadhewa Arkasha, Chaudhary Alina, Panggalo Lydia V, Rumaseb Angela, Adhikari Nabaraj, Adhikari Sanjib, Rijal Komal Raj, Banjara Megha Raj, Price Ric N, Thriemer Kamala, Ghimire Prakash, Ley Benedikt, Satyagraha Ari Winasti

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In remote communities, diagnosis of G6PD deficiency is challenging. We assessed the impact of modified test procedures and delayed testing for the point-of-care diagnostic STANDARD G6PD (SDBiosensor, RoK), and evaluated recommended cut-offs. We tested capillary blood from fingerpricks (Standard Method) and a microtainer (BD, USA; Method 1), venous blood from a vacutainer (BD, USA; Method 2), varied sample application methods (Methods 3), and used micropipettes rather than the test's single-use pipette (Method 4). Repeatability was assessed by comparing median differences between paired measurements. All methods were tested 20 times under laboratory conditions on three volunteers. The Standard Method and the method with best repeatability were tested in Indonesia and Nepal. In Indonesia 60 participants were tested in duplicate by both methods, in Nepal 120 participants were tested in duplicate by either method. The adjusted male median (AMM) of the Biosensor Standard Method readings was defined as 100% activity. In Indonesia, the difference between paired readings of the Standard and modified methods was compared to assess the impact of delayed testing. In the pilot study repeatability didn't differ significantly (p = 0.381); Method 3 showed lowest variability. One Nepalese participant had <30% activity, one Indonesian and 10 Nepalese participants had intermediate activity (≥30% to <70% activity). Repeatability didn't differ significantly in Indonesia (Standard: 0.2U/gHb [IQR: 0.1-0.4]; Method 3: 0.3U/gHb [IQR: 0.1-0.5]; p = 0.425) or Nepal (Standard: 0.4U/gHb [IQR: 0.2-0.6]; Method 3: 0.3U/gHb [IQR: 0.1-0.6]; p = 0.330). Median G6PD measurements by Method 3 were 0.4U/gHb (IQR: -0.2 to 0.7, p = 0.005) higher after a 5-hour delay compared to the Standard Method. The definition of 100% activity by the Standard Method matched the manufacturer-recommended cut-off for 70% activity. We couldn't improve repeatability. Delays of up to 5 hours didn't result in a clinically relevant difference in measured G6PD activity. The manufacturer's recommended cut-off for intermediate deficiency is conservative.

Для цитирования: Sadhewa Arkasha, Chaudhary Alina, Panggalo Lydia V, Rumaseb Angela, Adhikari Nabaraj, Adhikari Sanjib, Rijal Komal Raj, Banjara Megha Raj, Price Ric N, Thriemer Kamala, Ghimire Prakash, Ley Benedikt, Satyagraha Ari Winasti. Field assessment of the operating procedures of a semi-quantitative G6PD Biosensor to improve repeatability of routine testing.. PloS one. 2024. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296708.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.