Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
Scalable plasma and digital cognitive markers for diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsoy Elena, La Joie Renaud, VandeVrede Lawren, Rojas Julio C, Yballa Claire, Chan Brandon, Lago Argentina Lario, Rodriguez Anne-Marie, Goode Collette A, Erlhoff Sabrina J, Tee Boon Lead, Windon Charles, Lanata Serggio, Kramer Joel H, Miller Bruce L, Dilworth-Anderson Peggye, Boxer Adam L, Rabinovici Gil D, Possin Katherine L
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: With emergence of disease-modifying therapies, efficient diagnostic pathways are critically needed to identify treatment candidates, evaluate disease severity, and support prognosis. A combination of plasma biomarkers and brief digital cognitive assessments could provide a scalable alternative to current diagnostic work-up.
METHODS: We examined the accuracy of plasma biomarkers and a 10-minute supervised tablet-based cognitive assessment (Tablet-based Cognitive Assessment Tool Brain Health Assessment [TabCAT-BHA]) in predicting amyloid β positive (Aβ+) status on positron emission tomography (PET), concurrent disease severity, and functional decline in 309 older adults with subjective cognitive impairment (n = 49), mild cognitive impairment (n = 159), and dementia (n = 101).
RESULTS: Combination of plasma pTau181, Aβ42/40, neurofilament light (NfL), and TabCAT-BHA was optimal for predicting Aβ-PET positivity (AUC = 0.962). Whereas NfL and TabCAT-BHA optimally predicted concurrent disease severity, combining these with pTau181 and glial fibrillary acidic protein was most accurate in predicting functional decline.
DISCUSSION: Combinations of plasma and digital cognitive markers show promise for scalable diagnosis and prognosis of ADRD.
HIGHLIGHTS: The need for cost-efficient diagnostic and prognostic markers of AD is urgent. Plasma and digital cognitive markers provide complementary diagnostic contributions. Combination of these markers holds promise for scalable diagnosis and prognosis. Future validation in community cohorts is needed to inform clinical implementation.
METHODS: We examined the accuracy of plasma biomarkers and a 10-minute supervised tablet-based cognitive assessment (Tablet-based Cognitive Assessment Tool Brain Health Assessment [TabCAT-BHA]) in predicting amyloid β positive (Aβ+) status on positron emission tomography (PET), concurrent disease severity, and functional decline in 309 older adults with subjective cognitive impairment (n = 49), mild cognitive impairment (n = 159), and dementia (n = 101).
RESULTS: Combination of plasma pTau181, Aβ42/40, neurofilament light (NfL), and TabCAT-BHA was optimal for predicting Aβ-PET positivity (AUC = 0.962). Whereas NfL and TabCAT-BHA optimally predicted concurrent disease severity, combining these with pTau181 and glial fibrillary acidic protein was most accurate in predicting functional decline.
DISCUSSION: Combinations of plasma and digital cognitive markers show promise for scalable diagnosis and prognosis of ADRD.
HIGHLIGHTS: The need for cost-efficient diagnostic and prognostic markers of AD is urgent. Plasma and digital cognitive markers provide complementary diagnostic contributions. Combination of these markers holds promise for scalable diagnosis and prognosis. Future validation in community cohorts is needed to inform clinical implementation.