MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/mds.26629

Медицинская библиотека · Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2016

Cerebellar dysfunction in essential tremor.

Hanajima Ritsuko, Tsutsumi Ryosuke, Shirota Yuichiro, Shimizu Takahiro, Tanaka Nobuyuki, Ugawa Yoshikazu

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Few neurophysiological studies have investigated cerebellar function in patients with essential tremor, even though the cerebellum may contribute to tremor generation. Here, we studied cerebellar function in patients with essential tremor using 2 physiological methods.

METHODS

Participants were 20 patients with essential tremor and 30 age-matched healthy volunteers, and the results were compared across the groups. We studied motor cortical inhibition using cerebellar magnetic stimulation and prism adaptation.

RESULTS

Both cerebellar inhibition and prism adaptation were affected in patients with essential tremor. The degree of tremor did not correlate with the degree of abnormality in either of the 2 experiments.

CONCLUSIONS

The simplest explanation for the present results is that the cerebellum itself, including the Purkinje cells, is involved in essential tremor, which may reflect a primary pathogenic lesion or secondary compensatory physiological phenomenon to an original pathogenic lesion elsewhere. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Для цитирования: Hanajima Ritsuko, Tsutsumi Ryosuke, Shirota Yuichiro, Shimizu Takahiro, Tanaka Nobuyuki, Ugawa Yoshikazu. Cerebellar dysfunction in essential tremor.. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2016. DOI: 10.1002/mds.26629.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.