Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
Intraoperative monitoring of trigemino-palatal responses.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leote Joao, Pescador Ana Mirallave, Díaz-Baamonde Alba, Siado Mosquera José David, Murace Sian, Lejarde Arjel, Lawson Emily, Barazi Sinan, Shapey Jonathan, Lavrador Jose Pedro, Bleil Cristina, Valls-Sole Josep
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Our study aim was to describe the methodology for intraoperative recording of trigemino-palatal responses during posterior fossa surgeries.
METHODS: Trigeminal nerve stimuli (2-4 pulses with 200-500 µs duration, 2 ms inter-stimulus interval, 25-50 mA) was applied to V3 under the zygomatic arch. Responses were recorded through needle electrodes inserted bilaterally in the soft palate, and through surface electrodes embedded in the endotracheal tube. Onset latency (L), duration (D) and peak-to-peak amplitude (A) were measured in each triggered response.
RESULTS: The trigemino-palatal responses were successfully recorded in 23 out of 38 patients, bilateral in 12 of them. Response data (mean and IC 95 %) were L: 42 ms [35-57 ms]; D:45 ms [23-61 ms]; A:67 µs [57-183 µs]. Vocal cords responses were also recorded to trigeminal V3 stimulation in six patients with L:40 ms [37-47 ms]; D:25 ms [18-65 ms], and A: 70 µs [37-96 µs].
CONCLUSION: Trigemino-palatal responses were obtained under general anesthesia and used for the monitorization of patients submitted to posterior fossa surgery. Further studies are needed to foster the use of these responses for intraoperative monitorization.
SIGNIFICANCE: Trigeminal V2/V3 branches trigger brainstem palatal responses that remain obtainable after general anesthesia.
METHODS: Trigeminal nerve stimuli (2-4 pulses with 200-500 µs duration, 2 ms inter-stimulus interval, 25-50 mA) was applied to V3 under the zygomatic arch. Responses were recorded through needle electrodes inserted bilaterally in the soft palate, and through surface electrodes embedded in the endotracheal tube. Onset latency (L), duration (D) and peak-to-peak amplitude (A) were measured in each triggered response.
RESULTS: The trigemino-palatal responses were successfully recorded in 23 out of 38 patients, bilateral in 12 of them. Response data (mean and IC 95 %) were L: 42 ms [35-57 ms]; D:45 ms [23-61 ms]; A:67 µs [57-183 µs]. Vocal cords responses were also recorded to trigeminal V3 stimulation in six patients with L:40 ms [37-47 ms]; D:25 ms [18-65 ms], and A: 70 µs [37-96 µs].
CONCLUSION: Trigemino-palatal responses were obtained under general anesthesia and used for the monitorization of patients submitted to posterior fossa surgery. Further studies are needed to foster the use of these responses for intraoperative monitorization.
SIGNIFICANCE: Trigeminal V2/V3 branches trigger brainstem palatal responses that remain obtainable after general anesthesia.