Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology · 2006
[Follow-up examination for newborns and infants who failed hearing screening].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Jun, Chen Shufei, Zheng Zhoushu, Xu Ming, Shen Anmin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hearing change and the characteristic of hearing thresholds of the infants failing in the hearing screening.
METHOD: ABR,DPOAE and acoustic immittance were used to test infants failing in the screening in their third month and the sixth month, whose results were compared.
RESULT: In the third month the false positive rate of DPOAE test was 9.6%. Comparing with the results tested in the third month, the degree of severe hearing loss retested in the sixth month did not change much. But the percentage of the slight-moderate hearing loss improvement to normal or better was higher. Comparing ABR threshold result in the third month and that in the sixth month, t = 3.496, P <0.01 in the left ear, and t = 5.572, P <0.01 in the right ear, respectively. There was significant difference between these results.
CONCLUSION: The new-borns failing DPOAE can not be just considered to identifying hearing loss,and it must be with the ABR to make the diagnosis. It is feasible to diagnose severe-profound hearing loss in the third month and interfere before the sixth month, but the infants with mild-moderate hearing loss must undertake the auditory tests more than twice and be followed up in more than half a year, then we can make diagnosis according to the audiologic evaluations results and the daily behaviors.
METHOD: ABR,DPOAE and acoustic immittance were used to test infants failing in the screening in their third month and the sixth month, whose results were compared.
RESULT: In the third month the false positive rate of DPOAE test was 9.6%. Comparing with the results tested in the third month, the degree of severe hearing loss retested in the sixth month did not change much. But the percentage of the slight-moderate hearing loss improvement to normal or better was higher. Comparing ABR threshold result in the third month and that in the sixth month, t = 3.496, P <0.01 in the left ear, and t = 5.572, P <0.01 in the right ear, respectively. There was significant difference between these results.
CONCLUSION: The new-borns failing DPOAE can not be just considered to identifying hearing loss,and it must be with the ABR to make the diagnosis. It is feasible to diagnose severe-profound hearing loss in the third month and interfere before the sixth month, but the infants with mild-moderate hearing loss must undertake the auditory tests more than twice and be followed up in more than half a year, then we can make diagnosis according to the audiologic evaluations results and the daily behaviors.