Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2009
Laparoscopically assisted myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy in short-term outcomes: a prospective study.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kalogiannidis Ioannis, Prapas Nikos, Xiromeritis Panayotis, Prapas Yannis
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Comparison between laparoscopically assisted myomectomy (LAM) and abdominal myomectomy (laparotomy), used in the management of women with intramural or subserous uterine fibroids up to 90 mm of maximum diameter.
METHODS: Seventy-five premenopausal women were prospectively enrolled in the study, managed by LAM (n=48) or by laparotomy (n=27) approach. The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. The patient characteristics were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) estimated blood loss was significantly less in the LAM procedure compared with laparotomy (246+/-161 vs. 351+/-219 ml, respectively, P=0.03). Similarly, the operative time was shorter in the LAM modality compared with laparotomy (68+/-21 vs. 83+/-24 min, respectively, P=0.01). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were not different between the two groups. The mean days of the bowel reactivity (1.04+/-0.2) was faster (P<0.0001), while the duration of hospitalization (1.2+/-0.6) was shorter (P<0.0001) in the LAM technique, when compared with abdominal myomectomy (1.8+/-0.5 and 4.2+/-0.8, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In selected group of patients, LAM as minimally invasive approach is an attractive alternative to conventional laparotomic myomectomy, offering significant advantages.
METHODS: Seventy-five premenopausal women were prospectively enrolled in the study, managed by LAM (n=48) or by laparotomy (n=27) approach. The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. The patient characteristics were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) estimated blood loss was significantly less in the LAM procedure compared with laparotomy (246+/-161 vs. 351+/-219 ml, respectively, P=0.03). Similarly, the operative time was shorter in the LAM modality compared with laparotomy (68+/-21 vs. 83+/-24 min, respectively, P=0.01). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were not different between the two groups. The mean days of the bowel reactivity (1.04+/-0.2) was faster (P<0.0001), while the duration of hospitalization (1.2+/-0.6) was shorter (P<0.0001) in the LAM technique, when compared with abdominal myomectomy (1.8+/-0.5 and 4.2+/-0.8, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In selected group of patients, LAM as minimally invasive approach is an attractive alternative to conventional laparotomic myomectomy, offering significant advantages.