Vnitrni lekarstvi · 2017
[Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation performed under general anesthesia: results of a unicentric randomized trial].
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stašková Klára, Bulava Alan, Tesařík Richard, Toušek František
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) has recently become a routine part of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. The goal of our study was to determine whether the implementation of RFA of AF under general anesthesia (GA), compared to analgosedation (AS), will affect important characteristics of the ablation procedure, comfort of the patient and whether there is any clinical impact on the complication rate and the overall success of the procedure.
METHODS: 50 patients with AF were randomized in a ratio of 1 : 1 into two groups for RFA in AS and in GA. Procedural characteristics, arrhythmia-free survival for the time of 12 months and subjective evaluation of pain tolerability of the procedure were monitored.
RESULTS: Overall procedural times were comparable in GA and AS groups (111.2 ± 16.3 min vs 104.8 ± 25 min, p = NS). Time needed for preparation of patients was significantly longer in the GA group, while time needed for electrical disconnection of all pulmonary veins (PVs) was significantly shortened. Electrical isolation of the ipsilateral PVs after the last RF application was achieved in 94 % of lesions in GA and in 78 % of lesions in AS, respectively (p = 0.02). Shorter time of RF energy application to achieve electrical isolation of PVs was needed in the group of GA than in the group of AS (1 386 ± 387 s vs 1 745 ± 463 s, p = 0.005). Subjective discomfort evaluation of the procedure was more favorable in patients in the GA group. 88 % of patients in the GA group vs 68 % patients in AS (p = 0.1) had stable sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic treatment during the 12 month period following the index procedure. While in the GA group all 3 patients with AF recurrence were willing to undergo another procedure in the GA, in the AS group only one patient out of 8 patients with AF recurrences underwent reablation.
CONCLUSION: RFA of AF performed under GA provided improved tolerance and positive perception of the procedure, higher final treatment success and improved quality of life.Key words: general anesthesia - paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - pulmonary vein isolation - radiofrequency catheter ablation.
METHODS: 50 patients with AF were randomized in a ratio of 1 : 1 into two groups for RFA in AS and in GA. Procedural characteristics, arrhythmia-free survival for the time of 12 months and subjective evaluation of pain tolerability of the procedure were monitored.
RESULTS: Overall procedural times were comparable in GA and AS groups (111.2 ± 16.3 min vs 104.8 ± 25 min, p = NS). Time needed for preparation of patients was significantly longer in the GA group, while time needed for electrical disconnection of all pulmonary veins (PVs) was significantly shortened. Electrical isolation of the ipsilateral PVs after the last RF application was achieved in 94 % of lesions in GA and in 78 % of lesions in AS, respectively (p = 0.02). Shorter time of RF energy application to achieve electrical isolation of PVs was needed in the group of GA than in the group of AS (1 386 ± 387 s vs 1 745 ± 463 s, p = 0.005). Subjective discomfort evaluation of the procedure was more favorable in patients in the GA group. 88 % of patients in the GA group vs 68 % patients in AS (p = 0.1) had stable sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic treatment during the 12 month period following the index procedure. While in the GA group all 3 patients with AF recurrence were willing to undergo another procedure in the GA, in the AS group only one patient out of 8 patients with AF recurrences underwent reablation.
CONCLUSION: RFA of AF performed under GA provided improved tolerance and positive perception of the procedure, higher final treatment success and improved quality of life.Key words: general anesthesia - paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - pulmonary vein isolation - radiofrequency catheter ablation.