MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.02775.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2008

Contact sensitization in patients with chronic wounds: results of a prospective investigation.

Freise J, Kohaus S, Korber A, Hillen U, Kroger K, Grabbe S, Dissemond J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

It is well known that patients with chronic wounds frequently acquire clinically relevant contact sensitizations to skin care products.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to find out the actual frequency of contact sensitivities in patients with chronic wounds in Germany with particular attention to components of products used in modern wound therapy.

METHODS

We examined the results of a prospective clinical investigation on skin patch tests of patients with chronic wounds.

RESULTS

Altogether, 45 patients with chronic wounds were tested. In 25 (55.5%) of the examined patients, contact sensitization to at least one substance was detected. The most frequent contact sensitizations were to PVP-iodine (20%), balsam of Peru (15.6%) patients, fragrance mix (11.1%), colophony (8.8%) and potassium dichromate (6.7%). We also found sensitization to the wound dressings Varihesive (11.1%), Iruxol N (6.7%) and Comfeel (2.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

We would like to propagate that therapists who are involved in wound treatment should also pay attention on the ingredients of applied modern wound dressings.

Для цитирования: Freise J, Kohaus S, Korber A, Hillen U, Kroger K, Grabbe S, Dissemond J. Contact sensitization in patients with chronic wounds: results of a prospective investigation.. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.02775.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.