MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/biomedicines12092160

Медицинская библиотека · Biomedicines · 2024

Patients with Taste Disorders in a Hospital's Dental Department and Strategies for Taste Disorders.

Itagaki Tatsuki, Sakata Ken-Ichiro, Okura Taro, Kobayashi Hirokazu, Hayata Sadasuke, Kitagawa Yoshimasa

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background/

Objectives

A retrospective study was conducted to clarify the clinical characteristics of taste disorder cases at the Department of Oral Medicine of Hokkaido University Hospital. The subjects were 322 taste disorder patients (86 male, 236 female, average age: 66 (13.1) years, mean duration of disorder: 15.2 (20.0) months) who were treated at our department from 2007 to 2018.

Methods

Associations between symptoms and classification were examined.

Results

When looking at the taste symptoms, 154 cases of quantitative taste disorder were observed as taste loss, abscission, and dissociative taste disorder, and 168 cases of qualitative taste disorder were observed as spontaneous abnormal taste, dysgeusia, and maltaste. There was no relationship between sex and quantitative/qualitative taste disorders at V = 0.08. When looking at the causes of taste disorders, the majority were psychogenic, idiopathic, and oral diseases.

Conclusions

Approximately 20% of taste disorders are caused by oral diseases, so it should be noted that oral diseases such as oral candidiasis and xerostomia can cause taste disorders and that many of them can be improved with oral treatment.

Для цитирования: Itagaki Tatsuki, Sakata Ken-Ichiro, Okura Taro, Kobayashi Hirokazu, Hayata Sadasuke, Kitagawa Yoshimasa. Patients with Taste Disorders in a Hospital's Dental Department and Strategies for Taste Disorders.. Biomedicines. 2024. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12092160.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.