MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.05.007

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2005

The bifid visual evoked potential-normal variant or a sign of demyelination?

Rousseff Rossen T, Tzvetanov Plamen, Rousseva Maria A

Клиническое исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic significance of bifid VEP at initial presentation.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A hundred and sixteen patients (46 males and 70 females, age 15-54, mean 28.8), with a clinical suspicion of multiple sclerosis (MS), underwent pattern-shift VEP investigation between 1992 and 1998. They were further followed by clinical, CSF, MRI means for at least 5 years (mean 7.2). Twenty-six patients remained healthy, while 90 developed demyelinating disease (in 71 MS and in 19 optic neuritis was the final diagnosis). Fifty healthy persons (20 males aged 18-51, mean 28.8 and 30 females aged 18-48, mean 26.2) represented the control group. The number of persons with bifid VEP in each group are analyzed.

RESULTS

In the controls one out of 50 exhibited bifid VEP configuration. Of 26 patients with unconfirmed suspicion for MS again one had such responses. Bifid VEP were significantly more frequent in patients with demyelinative pathology (nine out of 90, 10.0%, P (chi-squared) < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Bifid VEP is rarely observed in healthy persons. Its presence should suggest the possibility of demyelinating disease and prompt further investigation and follow-up.

Для цитирования: Rousseff Rossen T, Tzvetanov Plamen, Rousseva Maria A. The bifid visual evoked potential-normal variant or a sign of demyelination?. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.05.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.