La Clinica terapeutica · 2012
[Results about the use of a silicone catheter in the stadiation of rectal mucosal prolapse and hemorrhoidal prolapse].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gaj F, Trecca A, Andreuccetti J, Crispino P
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Rectal mucosal prolapse was characterized by the protrusion of the mucosa alone in the rectal lumen. Hemorrhoidal prolapse is an extreme pathological condition oh haemorrhoidal disease. The Authors after an experience conducted in ambulatory patients have performed a technique for the staging of rectal mucosal prolapse and hemorrhoidal prolapse based on the use of an endorectal silicone catheter with a balloon in the extremity.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients with proctological symptoms during ambulatory visit has been submitted to a less invasive test in comparison to those traditional, using an endorectal silicone catheter with a balloon in the extremity, to insert in rectal lumen and to remove outside through the anus.
RESULTS: Only in 18 patients, the method gave the exact size of the prolapse and only 16 patients was able to accurately predict the reducibility or not. Of the 18 patients in 12 patients showed a mucosal prolapse was 50% of the circumference of the anal canal, in 6 patients showed a prolapse was between 50% and 75%. In 22 patients had been diagnosed with the absence of prolapse, then denied by the plug test that showed prolapse below the 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of mucosal prolapse and hemorrhoidal prolapse through silicone catheter test has not proven better than the traditional plug test.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients with proctological symptoms during ambulatory visit has been submitted to a less invasive test in comparison to those traditional, using an endorectal silicone catheter with a balloon in the extremity, to insert in rectal lumen and to remove outside through the anus.
RESULTS: Only in 18 patients, the method gave the exact size of the prolapse and only 16 patients was able to accurately predict the reducibility or not. Of the 18 patients in 12 patients showed a mucosal prolapse was 50% of the circumference of the anal canal, in 6 patients showed a prolapse was between 50% and 75%. In 22 patients had been diagnosed with the absence of prolapse, then denied by the plug test that showed prolapse below the 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of mucosal prolapse and hemorrhoidal prolapse through silicone catheter test has not proven better than the traditional plug test.