Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2010
Rectal perforation after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: possible causes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gao Xian Hua, Wang Han Tao, Chen Ji Gui, Yang Xiao Dong, Qian Qun, Fu Chuan Gang
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Our aim was to explore possible causes of rectal perforation occurring in patients who undergo the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids.
METHODS: We evaluated data from cases of rectal perforation that occurred after the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in China in conjunction with case reports from the international medical literature.
RESULTS: We identified 7 patients from 5 hospitals in 2 provinces of China who had rectal perforation after the procedure despite having received prophylactic antibiotic treatment. Two patients had a disrupted staple line and 5 had perforations on the rectum wall above the intact staple line. Six patients presented with symptoms in the first 3 days after the procedure. Three patients had concomitant disease: 1 had concomitant constipation and internal rectal prolapse, 1 had concomitant constipation, and 1 had concomitant liver cirrhosis ascites that was not diagnosed preoperatively. Of the 15 cases of rectal perforation found in the literature, 3 patients had an intact staple line and 5 patients had a ruptured staple line.
CONCLUSION: The cone-shaped tip of the anvil, concomitant rectal prolapse and pelvic floor descent, and concomitant ascites are possible causes of rectal perforation after the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids.
METHODS: We evaluated data from cases of rectal perforation that occurred after the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in China in conjunction with case reports from the international medical literature.
RESULTS: We identified 7 patients from 5 hospitals in 2 provinces of China who had rectal perforation after the procedure despite having received prophylactic antibiotic treatment. Two patients had a disrupted staple line and 5 had perforations on the rectum wall above the intact staple line. Six patients presented with symptoms in the first 3 days after the procedure. Three patients had concomitant disease: 1 had concomitant constipation and internal rectal prolapse, 1 had concomitant constipation, and 1 had concomitant liver cirrhosis ascites that was not diagnosed preoperatively. Of the 15 cases of rectal perforation found in the literature, 3 patients had an intact staple line and 5 patients had a ruptured staple line.
CONCLUSION: The cone-shaped tip of the anvil, concomitant rectal prolapse and pelvic floor descent, and concomitant ascites are possible causes of rectal perforation after the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids.