The British journal of surgery · 2010
Randomized clinical trial of symptom control after stapled anopexy or diathermy excision for haemorrhoid prolapse.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nyström P-O, Qvist N, Raahave D, Lindsey I, Mortensen N, Stapled or Open Pile Procedure (STOPP) trial study group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: : This multicentre randomized clinical trial studied how symptoms improved after either stapled anopexy or diathermy excision of haemorrhoids.
METHODS: : The study involved 18 hospitals in Sweden, Denmark and the UK. Some 207 patients were randomized to either anopexy or Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy, of whom 90 in each group were operated on. Patients reported symptoms before surgery and after 1 year. Daily postoperative pain scores were recorded in a patient diary. Surgeons evaluated the anal anatomy before surgery and after 1 year.
RESULTS: : Correction of prolapse in the anopexy and haemorrhoidectomy groups was similar at 1 year (88 and 90 per cent respectively; P = 0.80). Freedom from symptoms was obtained in 44 and 69 per cent respectively (P = 0.002). Stapled anopexy was associated with less postoperative pain, which resolved more quickly (P = 0.004). Significant improvements were noted in anal continence and well-being 1 year after both operations (P < 0.001). Excessive pain was the most common complication after diathermy excision and disturbed bowel function after stapled anopexy.
CONCLUSION: : Haemorrhoidal prolapse was corrected equally by either operation. Diathermy haemorrhoidectomy gave better symptom relief but was more painful. Neither operation provided complete cure but well-being was greatly improved.
REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN68315343 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
METHODS: : The study involved 18 hospitals in Sweden, Denmark and the UK. Some 207 patients were randomized to either anopexy or Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy, of whom 90 in each group were operated on. Patients reported symptoms before surgery and after 1 year. Daily postoperative pain scores were recorded in a patient diary. Surgeons evaluated the anal anatomy before surgery and after 1 year.
RESULTS: : Correction of prolapse in the anopexy and haemorrhoidectomy groups was similar at 1 year (88 and 90 per cent respectively; P = 0.80). Freedom from symptoms was obtained in 44 and 69 per cent respectively (P = 0.002). Stapled anopexy was associated with less postoperative pain, which resolved more quickly (P = 0.004). Significant improvements were noted in anal continence and well-being 1 year after both operations (P < 0.001). Excessive pain was the most common complication after diathermy excision and disturbed bowel function after stapled anopexy.
CONCLUSION: : Haemorrhoidal prolapse was corrected equally by either operation. Diathermy haemorrhoidectomy gave better symptom relief but was more painful. Neither operation provided complete cure but well-being was greatly improved.
REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN68315343 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).