Journal of affective disorders · 2017
Cognitive functioning in first episode bipolar I disorder patients with and without history of psychosis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Trisha Chakrabarty, Golnoush Alamian, Jan-Marie Kozicky, Torres Ivan J, Yatham Lakshmi N
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Psychosis in bipolar I disorder (BDI) has been associated with increased cognitive dysfunction, which may relate to poorer functional outcomes. However, it is not known whether cognition differs between BDI patients with (BDP+) or without (BDP-) history of psychosis early in the disease course, or if it is impacted by the presence of mood congruent (MCP) versus incongruent (MIC) psychotic features. We compare cognition between these groups in BDI patients recently recovered from first episode of mania.
METHODS: Attention, verbal learning/memory, processing speed and executive functioning were compared between: 1) all BDI patients (n = 73) and healthy controls (HC, n = 45), 2) BDP+ (n = 60) and BDP- (n = 13) patients and 3) MCP (n = 27) and MIC (n = 33) patients. Post-hoc analyses compared all patient groups with HC.
RESULTS: While BDI patients performed worse than HC in all domains, there were no significant differences between BDP+ and BDP-, or MCP and MIC, patients. However, BDP+ and MIC groups demonstrated different patterns of impairment compared to HC then did BDP- or MCP. Executive functioning and cognitive flexibility in particular appeared to be a deficit area in BDP+ patients.
LIMITATIONS: This study may have been underpowered to detect differences in direct comparison between BDP+ and BDP- patients.
CONCLUSION: While replication in larger samples is required, these results suggest that subtle cognitive differences between BDP+ and BDP-, and between MIC and MCP, patients may be present shortly after disease onset. These patient subsets may therefore be of interest in examining early intensive strategies to preserve cognition.
METHODS: Attention, verbal learning/memory, processing speed and executive functioning were compared between: 1) all BDI patients (n = 73) and healthy controls (HC, n = 45), 2) BDP+ (n = 60) and BDP- (n = 13) patients and 3) MCP (n = 27) and MIC (n = 33) patients. Post-hoc analyses compared all patient groups with HC.
RESULTS: While BDI patients performed worse than HC in all domains, there were no significant differences between BDP+ and BDP-, or MCP and MIC, patients. However, BDP+ and MIC groups demonstrated different patterns of impairment compared to HC then did BDP- or MCP. Executive functioning and cognitive flexibility in particular appeared to be a deficit area in BDP+ patients.
LIMITATIONS: This study may have been underpowered to detect differences in direct comparison between BDP+ and BDP- patients.
CONCLUSION: While replication in larger samples is required, these results suggest that subtle cognitive differences between BDP+ and BDP-, and between MIC and MCP, patients may be present shortly after disease onset. These patient subsets may therefore be of interest in examining early intensive strategies to preserve cognition.