Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2023
The lymphatic system of the uterine cervix: towards a more precise definition of the drainage routes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weyl Ariane, Sanson Claire, Roumiguié Matthieu, Chaynes Patrick, Rimailho Jacques, Martinez Alejandra, Chantalat Elodie
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Lymph node involvement in cancer of the uterine cervix is a major independent prognostic factor for overall survival. The aim of our study was to examine the lymphatic drainage regions of the different parts of the uterine cervix.
METHODS: An anatomical study of fresh cadavers was conducted by injecting patent blue in the anterior or posterior lip of the uterine cervix and dissecting drainage regions. Furthermore, a retrospective radiological and pathological studies were conducted on patients who were treated for early-stage cancer of the uterine cervix with lymph node involvement. Radiological analysis of pre-therapeutic MRIs and/or pathological analysis of surgical specimens showed the precise location of the tumour. A correlation between the anatomy of the primary lesion site and the lymphatic area involved was established.
RESULTS: We administered 15 cadaveric injections: 8 in the anterior lip of the uterine cervix and 7 in the posterior one. For 100% of the anterior lip injections, lymphatic drainage was bilateral ileo-obturator (n = 8/8) combined with bilateral parametrial drainage. For the posterior injections, there was never any ileo-obturator drainage, and 6 of the 7 (75%) posterior injections drained in the posterior uterine serosa. Concerning the clinical study, we included 21 patients. We observed a non-significant tendency towards bilateral lymph node involvement when the tumour of the anterior lip.
CONCLUSION: Physiological lymphatic drainage of the uterine cervix presents anatomical specificities, depending on the structure studied, anterior or posterior lip of the cervix. Better knowledge of these specificities should allow personalized surgery for each patient.
METHODS: An anatomical study of fresh cadavers was conducted by injecting patent blue in the anterior or posterior lip of the uterine cervix and dissecting drainage regions. Furthermore, a retrospective radiological and pathological studies were conducted on patients who were treated for early-stage cancer of the uterine cervix with lymph node involvement. Radiological analysis of pre-therapeutic MRIs and/or pathological analysis of surgical specimens showed the precise location of the tumour. A correlation between the anatomy of the primary lesion site and the lymphatic area involved was established.
RESULTS: We administered 15 cadaveric injections: 8 in the anterior lip of the uterine cervix and 7 in the posterior one. For 100% of the anterior lip injections, lymphatic drainage was bilateral ileo-obturator (n = 8/8) combined with bilateral parametrial drainage. For the posterior injections, there was never any ileo-obturator drainage, and 6 of the 7 (75%) posterior injections drained in the posterior uterine serosa. Concerning the clinical study, we included 21 patients. We observed a non-significant tendency towards bilateral lymph node involvement when the tumour of the anterior lip.
CONCLUSION: Physiological lymphatic drainage of the uterine cervix presents anatomical specificities, depending on the structure studied, anterior or posterior lip of the cervix. Better knowledge of these specificities should allow personalized surgery for each patient.