DOI 10.1080/08820538.2019.1620792
Disc Configuration as a Risk and Prognostic Factor in NAION: The Impact of Cup to Disc Ratio, Disc Diameter, and Crowding Index.
Аннотация
Purpose: The presence of the so called disc at risk (a small disc with no cupping) has been considered the main risk factor for the development of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). However its role as a prognostic factor has not been studied. Our aim was to determine the weight of disc configuration as a risk and a prognostic factor for NAION.
Methods
Case control study. Forty eyes of 40 patients who were diagnosed with NAION between 2008 and 2017, and 120 controls (3 controls for each patient) were included in the study. Disc diameter (DD), cup to disc ratio (CDR), and peripapillar retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) of the non-affected eye were measured using optic coherence tomography (3D OCT 2000, Topcon). Crowding index (CI) was defined as the quotient of average RNFLT and disc area. Mean deviation (MD) at the time of diagnosis and at least three months later was determined using a Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer (SITA standard 24-2 strategy). Visual acuity (VA) was measured using Snellen charts and transformed into LogMAR values.
Results
Only CDR was found to be a risk factor for NAION. No correlationship was found between CI and visual loss.
Conclusions
DD and CI did not show value as either prognostic or risk factors. Glial tissue may be a part of the content of the optic disc as important as axons. Our results are in line with the latest studies about NAION pathophysiology. Contrary to classic thinking, these papers have not found smaller disc diameters, but smaller values of lamina cribosa depth in NAION patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.