Labor induction in term gravidas with prelabor rupture of membranes and unfavorable cervixes: Oxytocin versus vaginal misoprostol.

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol induction in women with term prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) and unfavorable cervixes.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 589 pregnant women with term singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation, reactive nonstress tests, PROM of 2-24 h duration, Bishop score <6, and no previous uterine surgery were reviewed and divided into oxytocin (n = 301) and misoprostol (n = 288) groups. The primary outcomes were the rate of vaginal delivery and delivery within 24 h.

RESULTS

After 24 h of induction, the misoprostol group showed a significantly higher proportion of vaginal delivery (64.6% vs. 49.5%, P < 0.001) and a lower cesarean section delivery rate (11.5% vs. 25.2%, P < 0.001) than the oxytocin group. More primiparas in the misoprostol group achieved vaginal delivery within 24 h than in the oxytocin group (60.5% vs. 45.4%, P = 0.001). Among primiparas, the misoprostol group had a significantly lower cesarean delivery rate (12.6% vs. 27.5%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Vaginal misoprostol induction in term PROM gravidas with unfavorable cervixes was associated with lower cesarean section and higher vaginal delivery rates within 24 h than oxytocin infusion. Vaginal misoprostol and oxytocin infusion had similar maternal and neonatal outcomes.