Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2022
Exploring a Better Adjuvant Treatment for Surgically Treated High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Rongmin, Xiao Yinping, Ma Lingwei, Wu Zhiyong, Xia Hexia
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to explore a better adjuvant treatment for patients with high-grade (HG) neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas (NECC) who had undergone surgery as a primary treatment.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study, which involved women diagnosed as HG-NECC, was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. All patients had undergone radical surgery and pelvic lymphadenectomy with a laparotomy or a minimally invasive surgery. An analysis was made of the prognosis of HG-NECC.
METHODS: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method to be compared via log-rank tests. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the independent prognostic factors.
RESULTS: A number of 110 patients diagnosed as HG-NECC at the pathological stage IA2 to IIIC2 according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system were initially treated with a primary surgery between 2008 and 2020. The eligible patients had the median age of 42.5 years (range: 22-76), with the median follow-up period of 39.6 months (range: 1.0-156.6). The 5-year OS of the patients at pathological stage I, II, and III accounted for 84.9%, 85.7%, and 60.9%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed no significant differences in OS and PFS between postoperative chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone (OS: p = 0.77; PFS: p = 0.41). Etoposide plus platinum therapy did not improve OS when compared with platinum plus paclitaxel therapy after surgery (p = 0.71). The univariable analysis showed that chemotherapy with cycles ≥4 presented a better prognosis than with cycles <4 (OS: p = 0.01; HR = 6.71; PFS: p = 0.02; HR = 5.18). The multivariate analysis indicated that the cycles of chemotherapy (p = 0.02; HR 0.29) were a prognostic factor for PFS.
LIMITATIONS: A retrospective design and the absence of partial follow-up data are limitations of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: In initially surgically treated HG-NECC, postoperative chemotherapy alone showed no inferiority when compared with chemoradiotherapy for HG-NECC, and 4+ cycles of chemotherapy tended to produce a better prognosis than 4-ones.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study, which involved women diagnosed as HG-NECC, was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. All patients had undergone radical surgery and pelvic lymphadenectomy with a laparotomy or a minimally invasive surgery. An analysis was made of the prognosis of HG-NECC.
METHODS: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method to be compared via log-rank tests. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the independent prognostic factors.
RESULTS: A number of 110 patients diagnosed as HG-NECC at the pathological stage IA2 to IIIC2 according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system were initially treated with a primary surgery between 2008 and 2020. The eligible patients had the median age of 42.5 years (range: 22-76), with the median follow-up period of 39.6 months (range: 1.0-156.6). The 5-year OS of the patients at pathological stage I, II, and III accounted for 84.9%, 85.7%, and 60.9%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed no significant differences in OS and PFS between postoperative chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone (OS: p = 0.77; PFS: p = 0.41). Etoposide plus platinum therapy did not improve OS when compared with platinum plus paclitaxel therapy after surgery (p = 0.71). The univariable analysis showed that chemotherapy with cycles ≥4 presented a better prognosis than with cycles <4 (OS: p = 0.01; HR = 6.71; PFS: p = 0.02; HR = 5.18). The multivariate analysis indicated that the cycles of chemotherapy (p = 0.02; HR 0.29) were a prognostic factor for PFS.
LIMITATIONS: A retrospective design and the absence of partial follow-up data are limitations of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: In initially surgically treated HG-NECC, postoperative chemotherapy alone showed no inferiority when compared with chemoradiotherapy for HG-NECC, and 4+ cycles of chemotherapy tended to produce a better prognosis than 4-ones.