European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2022
Cervical cancer screening and outcomes for women under 25 years of age in Belgium: a 10-year nationwide study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Desimpel Fabian, Declercq Sabine, Makar Amin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to describe trends in cervical cancer screening and outcomes for women under 25 years of age in Belgium between 2010 and 2019 in response to a changed reimbursement policy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the databases of the National Health Insurance Institute (RIZIV/INAMI) and the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR) for a nationwide description of cervical screening, subsequent diagnostic procedures and outcomes for women younger than 20 years and women aged 20-25 years between 2010 and 2019.
RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, the number of cytology screening tests and annual screening rates in women younger than 25 years have been reduced by 50%, but no increases in invasive cervical cancer or high-grade intraepithelial lesion diagnoses were observed. The major determinant of this decreased overscreening has been the limitation of reimbursement in 2013 to once every 3 years instead of once every 2 years. In women aged 25-29 years, there is no increase in invasive cervical cancer diagnoses after decreased screening of women younger than 25 years. To detect 29 invasive cervical cancers in women younger than 25 during the 10-year study period, a total of 5606 conizations were performed and 43 million EUR of Belgian health insurance budget was spent. Since the cost of hospitalization, sickness leave and negative psychological impact were not included in our estimation, these costs are underestimated.
CONCLUSION: Incidence of cervical cancer in women under 25 years remains low and screening is not effective in preventing cervical cancer, although there is clear evidence of potential reproductive harm and financial cost. We state that restricting reimbursement of cervical cancer screening before the age of 25 will improve guideline adherence and decrease healthcare expenditures without negatively impacting the health of the population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the databases of the National Health Insurance Institute (RIZIV/INAMI) and the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR) for a nationwide description of cervical screening, subsequent diagnostic procedures and outcomes for women younger than 20 years and women aged 20-25 years between 2010 and 2019.
RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, the number of cytology screening tests and annual screening rates in women younger than 25 years have been reduced by 50%, but no increases in invasive cervical cancer or high-grade intraepithelial lesion diagnoses were observed. The major determinant of this decreased overscreening has been the limitation of reimbursement in 2013 to once every 3 years instead of once every 2 years. In women aged 25-29 years, there is no increase in invasive cervical cancer diagnoses after decreased screening of women younger than 25 years. To detect 29 invasive cervical cancers in women younger than 25 during the 10-year study period, a total of 5606 conizations were performed and 43 million EUR of Belgian health insurance budget was spent. Since the cost of hospitalization, sickness leave and negative psychological impact were not included in our estimation, these costs are underestimated.
CONCLUSION: Incidence of cervical cancer in women under 25 years remains low and screening is not effective in preventing cervical cancer, although there is clear evidence of potential reproductive harm and financial cost. We state that restricting reimbursement of cervical cancer screening before the age of 25 will improve guideline adherence and decrease healthcare expenditures without negatively impacting the health of the population.