MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/infdis/145.1.110

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of infectious diseases · 1982

A turbidimetric study of the responses of selected strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to eight antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics.

Greenwood D, Eley A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Turbidimetric and morphologic responses to eight antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics were compared for selected strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with different susceptibilities to carbenicillin. In conventional minimal inhibitory concentration tests, all of the newer antibiotics appeared more active than carbenicillin, and apalcillin and cefsulodin had the greatest overall activity. However, in turbidimetric tests the activity of apalcillin and three other N-acyl penicillins (azlocillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin) was inferior to that of carbenicillin and the other agents. The N-acyl penicillins were also all susceptible to intrinsic pseudomonal beta-lactamase, so that dense bacterial populations inactivated these antibiotics in concentrations of greater 128 micrograms/ml during overnight incubation. Against carbenicillin-resistant strains, carbenicillin, ticarcillin, and sulbenicillin were the least active antibiotics, and cefsulodin had the best overall activity. Turbidimetric monitoring highlights the problems of interpreting the results of conventional minimal inhibitory concentration tests, particularly when large inocula are involved.

Для цитирования: Greenwood D, Eley A. A turbidimetric study of the responses of selected strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to eight antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics.. The Journal of infectious diseases. 1982. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/145.1.110.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.