Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine · 2025
Comparison of patient-reported and objective functional measures during the early rehabilitative phase in patients with primary versus revision ACL reconstruction.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Hansung, Ambrose Michael, Thompson Xavier D, Cross Kevin M, Moler Casey, Gwathmey F Winston, Werner Brian C, Su Charles, Kuenze Christopher
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Few studies have determined how individuals who undergo a second ACL reconstruction (ACLR) perform in terms of objective and patient-reported outcomes in the early rehabilitation period compared to individuals who undergo primary ACLR. This study investigated the difference in strength and functional outcomes 3-5 months postoperatively in revision ACLR patients compared to primary ACLR patients.
DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Retrospective Chart Review.
SETTING: Single university-based orthopaedic practice.
PARTICIPANTS: 143 patients who underwent ACLR (121 primary, 22 revision) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength at 60°/s and 180°/s, the IKDC, KOOS, and ACL-RSI 4.2 ± 0.7 months after ACLR.
RESULTS: After controlling for age, sex, graft source, and time since surgery, there were no significant group differences for ACL-RSI (p = 0.771), IKDC (p = 0.950), and KOOS subscale scores (p = 0.335-0.740). Similarly, there were no significant group differences in isokinetic knee extension peak torque at 60°/s and 180°/s (p = 0.155, p = 0.147) and knee flexion peak torque 60°/s and 180°/s (p = 0.279, p = 0.325). Group LSIs were comparable for isokinetic knee extension and knee flexion.
CONCLUSION: Three to five months postoperatively, revision ACLR patients performed similarly in terms of thigh strength, limb symmetry, and patient-reported function compared to primary ACLR patients.
DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Retrospective Chart Review.
SETTING: Single university-based orthopaedic practice.
PARTICIPANTS: 143 patients who underwent ACLR (121 primary, 22 revision) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength at 60°/s and 180°/s, the IKDC, KOOS, and ACL-RSI 4.2 ± 0.7 months after ACLR.
RESULTS: After controlling for age, sex, graft source, and time since surgery, there were no significant group differences for ACL-RSI (p = 0.771), IKDC (p = 0.950), and KOOS subscale scores (p = 0.335-0.740). Similarly, there were no significant group differences in isokinetic knee extension peak torque at 60°/s and 180°/s (p = 0.155, p = 0.147) and knee flexion peak torque 60°/s and 180°/s (p = 0.279, p = 0.325). Group LSIs were comparable for isokinetic knee extension and knee flexion.
CONCLUSION: Three to five months postoperatively, revision ACLR patients performed similarly in terms of thigh strength, limb symmetry, and patient-reported function compared to primary ACLR patients.